The engineer uses the sailpoint.api.IdentityService in a BeanShell method to look up and return all account names for an identity on the application ' MagicBox ' . Is this a correct implementation?
Proposed Solution:
import sailpoint.api.IdentityService;
import sailpoint.api.SailPointContext;
import sailpoint.object.Application;
import sailpoint.object.Identity;
import sailpoint.object.Link;
import sailpoint.tools.GeneralException;
public List getAccountNames(SailPointContext context, Identity identity) throws GeneralException {
Application application = context.getObjectByName(Application.class, " MagicBox " );
IdentityService service = new IdentityService(context);
List < String > accountNames = new ArrayList < String > ();
List < Link > links = service.getLinks(identity, application);
if (links != null) {
for (Link link : links) {
accountNames.add(link.getNativeIdentity());
}
}
return accountNames;
}
Is this a question that an engineer should ask the customer when initially setting up a new IdentitylQ test environment?
Solution: Does the customer need a deployment accelerator? "
Is this statement valid regarding the control and usability of the Debug pages in IdentityIQ?
Proposed Solution:
The Debug Logging page has the location of the current loaded log4j file.
Is this a valid statement about connector rules?
Solution: A Post-Iterate Rule, if configured, is run after reading accounts from a SQL Loader application.
Can the search type in Identity be used to accomplish this result?
Proposed Solution:
Identifying the number of certifications that are currently in the revocation phase
Can the following be achieved via configuration of control variables in the out-of-the-box Lifecycle Manager (LCM) workflows?
Solution: Disable all notifications.
The engineer is working on a workflow implementation.
After a form step, the workflow can transition to three steps:
Stop if the Reject (back) button is used,
Audit if the Approve (next) button is used and the field named comment is returned from the form to the workflow variable comment and has a value,
Provision otherwise.
The engineer writes the transitions in XML code.
Is this a valid implementation?
Proposed Solution:
< Transition to= " Stop " when= " !ref:approved " / >
< Transition to= " Audit " when= " script:sailpoint.tools.Util.isNotNullOrEmpty(comment); " / >
< Transition to= " Provision " / >
An engineer needs to first create a custom audit event and then set up an associated report. What are four steps to accomplish this goal?
Solution: Create a Data Export task.
Can this action be performed as part of configuring an application definition in IdentitylQ?
Solution: Specify which users should be provisioned with a basic account as part of a joiner event.
Is this statement true about identitylQ ' s syslog event storage?
Solution: To improve security, items logged through syslog are unable to be sent to Log4j.
|
PDF + Testing Engine
|
|---|
|
$41.25 |
|
Testing Engine
|
|---|
|
$31.25 |
|
PDF (Q&A)
|
|---|
|
$26.25 |
SailPoint Free Exams |
|---|
|