Free Relativity RCA Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

The correct answer is C. Branding queue . Relativity’s official Production queue documentation states that during a production job, Relativity sends a job to the branding queue for stamping redactions, headers, or other image modifications, and any change to the priority of a job in the production queue changes its priority in the branding queue . This is a direct match to the question.

This linkage exists because branding is a dependent production-stage activity. When administrators reprioritize a production job, Relativity keeps the related branding work aligned so that downstream stamping and production preparation happen in the proper order. The other queues listed in the answers are separate queue systems and are not documented as automatically inheriting production queue priority changes. Therefore, from a Productions administration perspective, the queue whose priority is also changed is the Branding queue .

The correct answer is C. The fields returned by the Searchable Set saved search are all empty for this document. Relativity documents that dtSearch indexes are built against a Searchable Set, and administrators must manually update those indexes when the underlying document search sets change. Relativity also describes dtSearch as indexing the content made available through the configured search/index setup rather than magically finding text that is not present in the indexed fields. If the document is part of the saved search but the fields being indexed for that document are empty, there is effectively no searchable text for dtSearch to return for that record.

Option B is not the best answer because an incremental build is a maintenance activity for adding new documents, not the documented reason a single already-known document cannot be found. Relativity notes that incremental builds look for new documents in the searchable set and do not re-index previously indexed records with changed content, which is a different issue. Option D is unrelated because Review Center queue assignment does not control whether a document is searchable through a dtSearch index. Option A is also not the best explanation for this question; dtSearch availability is driven by index/searchable-set configuration and accessible indexed text, not by parent-email folder access in the way the option suggests. So the best RCA-aligned answer is that the document has no indexed searchable content in the fields returned by the searchable set.

The correct answer is D. Entity . Relativity’s official documentation explicitly states that the Entity object functions as the central location for people, companies, organizational groups, and their metadata . This wording appears directly in the Entity object documentation and is the exact phrasing reflected in the question.

The other options are incorrect because they serve different purposes in Relativity. A Field stores data elements, a Layout controls display and editing arrangements, and a Document represents reviewable content. None of these objects serves as the centralized person/company/group metadata object described in the official documentation. Therefore, the correct answer is Entity .

The correct answer is A. After updating fields in the searchable set. Relativity’s dtSearch index documentation states that you must perform a full build when you add an additional field to the index, change any index settings, change fields of the searchable set, or overlay text on existing fields . That directly matches option A.

By contrast, Relativity documents that an incremental build is used after adding or removing documents . That makes options B and D incorrect. “After using Swap Index” is not listed as a required trigger for a full build in the dtSearch console documentation. Therefore, the correct answer is that a full build is required after updating fields in the searchable set .

The correct answer is D. Replace produced images with a placeholder. Relativity’s official Re-production documentation lists supported and unsupported re-production types. Among the supported types, Relativity explicitly includes Replace produced images with placeholder (I-P) .

The same documentation also explicitly lists several unsupported types that correspond to the incorrect options in this question. Relativity states that replacing a document that was produced as native only with produced images or a placeholder is unsupported, which rules out option B. It also states that replacing a document that was produced as a placeholder with another placeholder is unsupported, which rules out option C. Option A is likewise unsupported because “replace produced images with a native” is not identified as a supported re-production type. Instead, Relativity supports image-to-placeholder, placeholder-to-images, and re-producing documents with the same number of pages.

This distinction matters because re-production is tightly controlled to preserve numbering integrity and production consistency. For example, when replacing produced images with placeholders, Relativity preserves the original Bates numbering while substituting placeholder pages. From an RCA production-administration perspective, the supported operation among the listed choices is clearly Replace produced images with a placeholder . Therefore, the correct answer is D .

The correct answer is D. Use Mass Replace to update the long text field with the fixed-length text field values. Relativity’s mass operations documentation explains that Mass Replace can be used not only to replace text with static content, but also for field-to-field operations. Specifically, the official examples include copying the contents of one text field to another and merging the values of a source field with the values of a target field . That directly fits this scenario, where the administrator needs to populate a newly created long text field with the existing values stored in a fixed-length text field across many documents.

The other options are less efficient or not aligned with standard Relativity functionality. Manual updates would be extremely slow and error-prone in an active review. Exporting and then overlaying values would create unnecessary extra steps and administrative overhead. Option B refers to Mass Merge , but in Relativity documentation the Merge mass operation is associated with Analytics entity handling, not with copying document text values between fields. For document field content migration, Mass Replace is the documented bulk-update tool. Because this question focuses on the fastest and most efficient administrative correction after review has started, the best practice is to create the correct long text field and then use Mass Replace to populate it from the original fixed-length text field.

The correct answer is B. Name conflicts: Rename or map Fields. Relativity’s Troubleshooting application installation errors documentation explains that for Name conflicts , the available resolution options include Rename and Map Field . The page specifically instructs admins to use the Resolve Errors drop-down and choose either Rename or Map Field to address the conflicting artifact during application installation.

The other choices are inconsistent with the documentation. For locking conflicts , Relativity says you can resolve them by selecting the Unlock checkbox, so option A is incorrect. For restricted file types , the documented resolution is to remove the external resource from the application and re-install , not simply “run a re-install,” so option D is incomplete and inaccurate. Option C is also too vague and not one of the documented named error-resolution pairings. Therefore, the correct expected application installation error and solution is Name conflicts: Rename or map Fields

The correct answer is B. dog not cat. Relativity’s dtSearch syntax guidance explains that the NOT operator can be used by itself at the beginning of an expression, or in the middle of an expression only when combined with either AND or OR. Relativity gives examples such as apple OR NOT pear and applesauce and NOT pear as valid syntax. That means expressions like dog OR NOT cat and dog AND NOT cat are valid, while dog NOT cat is missing the required connector and therefore causes a syntax problem.

Relativity’s Search Terms Report error documentation further explains that STRs surface syntax errors when the search index cannot process the term because of invalid syntax. In this case, dog not cat violates the dtSearch operator rule, so it is the option most clearly expected to fail with a syntax error in a search terms report. Option A is a standard Boolean expression and is valid. Options C and D both include the required connector before NOT, which matches Relativity’s documented dtSearch usage. Therefore, among the listed queries, dog not cat is the one that would cause a syntax error on an STR.

The correct answer is D. Building a search terms report. Relativity’s Search Terms Report documentation requires you to define report information including a Searchable Set, which is a saved search containing the documents to be evaluated by the STR. Relativity’s guidance for using STRs also states that you should define a saved search that returns the required document population for the searchable set. That makes a saved search a required component of building a search terms report.

The other options do not inherently require a saved search. A keyword search can be run directly in the search panel. A dashboard can be created without requiring a saved search as its core prerequisite. A persistent highlight set is commonly used with STR output, but the question asks which action itself requires a saved search, and the STR workflow is the one explicitly documented to require one. Therefore, the correct answer is Building a search terms report.

The correct answer is C. 100 . According to Relativity’s official Simple File Upload documentation, the SFUMaxFilesToUpload instance setting determines the maximum number of documents a user can upload at one time using Simple File Upload. Relativity states that administrators can configure this setting up to 100 files , and when the setting is at its maximum, users can upload up to 100 files at one time . If a user selects more than 100 files, Relativity uploads only the first 100 selected files and does not upload the remainder. Relativity also indicates that a warning message appears in the upload window when more than 100 files are selected.

This makes the answer operationally important for administrators because Simple File Upload is designed for lightweight, direct document uploads within a workspace, not for large-scale ingestion jobs. For more substantial data loading exercises, administrators typically use Relativity’s broader import workflows rather than relying on Simple File Upload. From an RCA perspective, knowing this limit helps with user support, upload troubleshooting, and setting expectations for workspace users who need to add small batches of documents quickly. Therefore, among the options given, 100 is the only choice that aligns with the official Relativity behavior for Simple File Upload.