Free PRMIA 8006 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

Equity futures are by far the most traded futures contracts in terms of value, followed by interest rate products. Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

The OTC market for foreign exchange is indeed much larger than the exchange traded futures market for FX. Therefore statement I is correct.

Delivery-versus-payment (DVP) arrangements make sure that title to a security passes only when payment has been made, and these arrangements, usually implemented through national clearing agencies such as the DTC in the US, help avoid the risk of counterparty defaults.

Electronic Clearing Networks (ECNs) offer cheaper trading costs than exchanges, in fact that is their primary attraction. Exchanges offer other advantages, but lower trading costs is not one of them.

ISDA master agreements provide templates that a large number of OTC market participants use to standardize their OTC trading activities. Therefore statement IV is correct.

Everything else remaining the same, an increase in the rate of dividends causes the value of call options to fall and the value of put options to rise. Therefore, Choice 'b' is the correct answer. (In the exam, the question could address either a call or a put option, so be aware of the answer in either case).

To understand this, consider how dividends are accounted for when valuing an option using the Black Scholes model. Future dividends are discounted to the present using the risk free rate and this discounted value is reduced from the spot price used in the BSM valuation. Effectively, this reduces the spot price used in the BSM formula. When the spot price reduces, and the exercise price remains the same, then the value of the call option goes down. In the same way, when spot price is reduced by the present value of dividends (and the exercise price stays the same), obviously the put option becomes more valuable. Therefore an increase in the rate of dividends increases the value of the put option.

There is another intuitive way to think about this: A call option is like a long position in the stock, but the holder of the call option is not entitled to receive dividends (unlike the holder of the stock). Since the holder of the call option has to forego the dividends, he is willing to pay less for the option; or in other words, the value of the call reduces.

In the same way, a put option is like having a short position in the stock. The holder of the short position has to borrow the stock in order to get into the short position in the first place. When dividends are paid, the holder of the short stock position has to make good any dividends that might be paid to the lender of the stock. The holder of a put option does not have to make any such payments. Therefore the put option is more valuable, and the existence of dividends (or an increase in dividends) increases the value of the put option.

(Try this out using the Black Scholes Excel model given under the tutorials by varying the spot price.)

The beta of a risky asset is determined solely by the covariance between the asset and the variance of the market portfolio. Recall that β = covariancex, y / variancex, where x is the market portfolio and y is the risky asset. Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

Systematic risk refers to market risk that cannot be diversified away. Specific risk relates to the unique risk from the securities selected in the portfolio, and these can be diversified away by adding other securities to the portfolio. Diversifiable risk is risk that can be diversified away, ie the same as specific risk. Portfolio risk is the total risk of the portfolio that includes both specific and systematic risk.

A high beta does not necessarily imply a high correlation with the market. The relationship

between beta and correlation can be expressed as 103.04.e2103.04.e2, where x is the market portfolio and y is the asset under consideration.

103.04.e

This means that a high market beta could be due to high volatility of the asset in question, and not because of a high correlation. Therefore statement I is not correct.Statement II is correct as correlation and covariance have the same sign. This is because correlation = covariance/product of standard deviations. Since standard deviation is always positive, correlation and covariance will have the same sign.A correlation of zero indicates the absence of a linear relationship between two variables - therefore statement III is correct.Statement IV is correct as well, because unless correlation is +1, diversification always reduces total portfolio risk.

Forward premium or discount can be easily calculated as {(Forward rate - Spot rate) / Spot rate x 365/number of days]. In this case, it can be calculated as =((1.1652 - 1.1763) / 1.1763 ) * 365/91 = 3.785%, which is a discount as it is a negative number. It can also be interpreted as a discount as the forward price is lower than the spot price.

The Sharpe ratio is the ratio of the excess returns of a portfolio to its volatility. It provides an intuitive measure of a portfolio's excess return over the risk free rate. The Sharpe ratio is calculated as [(Portfolio return - Risk free return)/Portfolio standard deviation].

The Treynor ratio is similar to the Sharpe ratio, but instead of using volatility in the denominator, it uses the portfolio's beta. Therefore the Treynor Ratio is calculated as [(Portfolio return - Risk free return)/Portfolio's beta]. Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

Jensen's alpha is another risk adjusted performance measure. It considers only the 'alpha', or the return attributable to a portfolio manager's skill. It is the difference between the return of the portfolio, and what the portfolio should theoretically have earned. Any portfolio can be expected to earn the risk free rate (rf), plus the market risk premium (which is given by [Beta x (Market portfolio's return - Risk free rate)]. Jensen's alpha is therefore the actual return earned less the risk free rate and the beta return.

Refer to the tutorial on risk adjusted performance measures for more details

A deep out of the money option will not react much to the change in the price of the underlying. In fact, the more out of the money it is, the more unresponsive it will be to changes in the prices of the underlying. Therefore, its delta will approach zero. Since delta is zero, gamma, which measures the rate of change in the delta, will also be zero as delta is unchanging. Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

The operating free cash flows can be considered a perpetual annuity with a given growth rate.

The value of a perpetuity of a periodic cash flow of 'c', with a discount rate 'r' and growth rate 'g' is given by c/(r - g). In the given case, the company can be considered as providing a perpetual annuity which provides an annual cash flow of $100 which are growing at 2.5% (equal to the GDP's growth rate, as given), and whose cost of capital, or the discount rate to use, is 7.5%

Therefore the value of the firm in this case is given by $100/(7.5% - 2.5%) = $2,000. Recall that the value of the firm is equal to the Operating Free Cash Flow/Weighted Average Cost of Capital (OFCF/WACC). Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.