Free PeopleCert MSP-Practitioner Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Design Theme in MSP 5th Edition is not limited to the technical architecture of the solution; it also encompasses the design of the delivery approach and the path to the future state. According to the MSP 5th Edition guidance, during the 'Design the outcomes' process, the programme must determine the most effective lifecycle for its constituent projects and workstreams. This involves deciding whether a linear, iterative (agile), or hybrid approach is most suitable for the nature of the change.

In this scenario, UU's decision to trial an agile approach is a fundamental design choice. Option D is the correct answer because the Design Theme is responsible for defining how the programme will transition from the current state to the target operating model. By choosing an iterative approach, the programme is "designing" the work to allow for rapid feedback, flexibility, and incremental value delivery. While this decision involves a "choice" (Option B), the MSP framework specifically categorizes the selection of delivery methodologies and lifecycles under the Design Theme because it shapes the entire strategy for how the outcomes will be realized. This alignment ensures that the delivery method matches the complexity and uncertainty of the programme's objectives, which is a key requirement of the Design Theme's focus on creating a viable and effective blueprint for transformation.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Design Theme in MSP 5th Edition focuses on defining the "future state" and the path to get there. This involves the Vision, the Benefit Map, and the Target Operating Model (TOM). However, the design is not fixed; it must be open to improvements that enhance the programme’s value. In risk management, a "risk" can be either a threat or an opportunity.

In this scenario, the new technology represents an opportunity—an uncertain event that would have a positive impact on objectives (reducing maintenance costs). Option A is correct because adding this opportunity to the risk register allows the programme to evaluate whether it should be "exploited" or "enhanced." This is a correct application of the Design Theme because it relates to a potential change in the technical design of the programme's output (the smart meters) to deliver better value. By recording it in the risk register, the programme manager ensures it is formally assessed for its impact on the TOM and the Business Case before being incorporated into the design.

A Vision Statement is a succinct and compelling description of the desirable future state that the programme aims to achieve. It serves to inspire and align stakeholders around the intended outcomes and benefits. The MSP Practitioner outlines key characteristics of a Vision Statement, including that it must describe a desirable future and be concise to ensure clarity and focus.

Key benefits are often implicit within the Vision, providing a motivational overview without delving into detailed measurement or timelines.

However, the Vision Statement is NOT normally time-dependent. Time frames and milestones are introduced later in the programme planning stages, such as in the Business Case or Programme Plan. The MSP Practitioner explains: “Vision statement does not include time frames until programme is time bound in nature,” which means the Vision is more about 'what' will be achieved rather than 'when.'

This approach allows the Vision to remain stable even if timeframes or specific project plans evolve. The focus remains on the transformational goal, providing a constant reference point as the programme adapts to challenges and changes.

Therefore, including time-dependence in the Vision Statement could unnecessarily constrain the programme’s strategic focus or create misalignment if schedules shift.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Risk Theme in MSP 5th Edition requires that all identified risks (both threats and opportunities) are assigned to an appropriate owner. A Risk Owner is someone who has the authority and resources to manage the risk and who is accountable for ensuring that the chosen response is implemented effectively. The seniority of the risk owner should be proportional to the level of risk exposure.

In this scenario, the risk—potential technological obsolescence or the opportunity for better technology—is categorized as high probability and high impact. This represents a significant exposure for the programme. Option A is the correct answer because MSP guidance states that high-priority risks that could fundamentally affect the programme's technical strategy or benefit realization should be owned by senior leaders. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the ideal owner because they have the strategic oversight and technical authority to manage a risk related to "next-generation" smart meters. Appointing a senior executive ensures that the risk receives the necessary attention at the Programme Board level and that the phased roll-out strategy is technically sound and aligned with the organization's long-term technology roadmap. This demonstrates a mature application of risk management where accountability is placed at the level where the most impact can be made.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Knowledge Theme in MSP 5th Edition encourages innovative and effective ways to facilitate learning and knowledge transfer. The framework recognizes that for complex organizational change to "stick," the people involved must not just receive information but actually engage with it and internalize it. Using interactive elements, such as gamification or collaborative workshops, is a recognized method for stimulating creativity and fostering a learning culture.

Option C is the correct answer. The CEngO’s request to remove the games based on a perception of them being "childish" ignores the psychological benefits of interactive learning. Games and simulations can help even highly experienced staff members explore new processes in a safe environment, share their own tacit knowledge, and identify potential flaws in the proposed future state. According to MSP guidance, the goal of knowledge management is to maximize the organization's capability to change. If the games are designed to help engineers "share ideas and experiences," they are serving a vital role in knowledge sharing. Removing them solely based on an assumption of the staff's reaction—without testing the effectiveness of the training—is contrary to the MSP's focus on evidence-based improvement and effective stakeholder engagement.

The POTI (Projects, Operations, Teams, and Infrastructure) model is part of the Blueprint governance theme. It defines the high-level scope and structure of the blueprint, outlining how projects, operational activities, teams, and infrastructure work together to deliver transformation.

The MSP Practitioner confirms: “POTI model defines scope blueprint,” situating it firmly within the Blueprint theme that describes the future state and the means to achieve it.

Understanding POTI helps in mapping and managing the components necessary for successful delivery of programme benefits within the defined future organizational state.

The Vision document is prepared specifically to share with stakeholders to communicate the desired future state the programme aims to achieve. It is a clear, inspirational statement designed to create alignment, motivation, and understanding among all parties involved.

The MSP Practitioner states: “Vision's purpose is to share the idea of better future planned by programme with all stakeholders.” It conveys the strategic intent and overarching goals without delving into technical or detailed delivery plans.

Unlike the Business Case or Blueprint, which are more technical or internal management documents, the Vision serves as a powerful communication tool fostering stakeholder engagement and support from the outset.

Project outputs are actually the output of delivering the capability, not an input. Inputs to delivering the capability include the Project Dossier, Business Case, and Blueprint, which provide the framework, justification, and detailed design for what is to be delivered.

The MSP Practitioner clarifies: “Project outputs are output of delivering the capability,” meaning these are the tangible products or deliverables produced by the projects managed within the programme. In contrast, the Project Dossier contains detailed descriptions and plans for the projects, the Business Case justifies the programme’s existence and value, and the Blueprint defines the future state and capabilities required.

This distinction is important because delivering the capability depends on having a clear, approved vision (Blueprint), a solid business justification (Business Case), and a structured project plan (Project Dossier). Only once these inputs are in place can project outputs be successfully created and integrated to achieve the programme’s objectives.

Understanding this flow ensures that programme teams focus on the correct artefacts at each stage—inputs for planning and delivery, outputs for realization and benefits management—ensuring clarity and control throughout the transformational flow.

Among the options, "Remaining aligned with corporate strategy" is identified as a core MSP programme management principle. The principles underpin the mindset and behaviors needed for successful programmes. Other options, like Quality and assurance management and Leadership and stakeholder management, fall under governance themes or transformational flow rather than principles.

Dependency management is not considered a principal control for managing the tranches but rather a governance control related to delivering the benefits.

The MSP Practitioner explains: “Dependency management is governance control for Delivering the benefits,” which means while dependencies between projects and benefits must be managed, they are not direct tranche controls.

Principal tranche controls focus on approving and reviewing Business Cases and conducting Benefit Reviews to ensure each tranche delivers value and remains aligned with strategic objectives.

Recognizing this distinction helps ensure the programme maintains effective controls focused on stage delivery and benefit realization without conflating governance functions.