Free OMG OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

In UML 2, the dashed arrow with an open arrowhead represents a dependency relationship. In the context of class diagrams, a dependency relationship indicates that changes to one class (the independent class) may cause changes in the other class (the dependent class). The direction of the arrow specifies which class is dependent on which. In the given diagram, the arrow points from class A to class B, which means that class A is dependent on class B. This could manifest as class A using some services or functions of class B, for example.

References:

• UML 2.5 Specification Document: The official document by the Object Management Group (OMG), which defines the syntax and semantics of UML.
• UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, Third Edition by Martin Fowler: This book provides a clear guide to UML and includes examples of dependency relationships.

An execution occurrence specification in UML sequence diagrams is represented by a thin rectangle on a lifeline. It shows that an instance is performing an action over a period of time.

In the provided sequence diagram, we can see three such thin rectangles on lifeline 'b', which indicates that there are three execution occurrence specifications.

• One for the message that comes from 'a' to 'b'.
• Another one for the message that 'b' sends to 'c'.
• And the last one for the return message from 'c' to 'b'.

There are no execution occurrence specifications on lifelines 'a' and 'c'.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D. 3

In UML, when you need to reference an element from another package while inside a different package, you use the qualified name. A qualified name includes the package name followed by two colons and then the element name. This ensures that the reference is clear and unambiguous, especially when different packages may have elements with the same name.

The correct syntax for referring to elementOneof PackageP1from inside PackageP2isP1::One, where::is the scope resolution operator used to separate the package name from the element name.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D. P1::One

The question asks to identify which object diagram corresponds to the provided class diagram. In order to verify which object diagram is correct, we must look at the class diagram to understand the relationships and multiplicities between the classes, and then match these with the objects and links in the object diagrams.

The class diagram (not visible in your query but implied to be the reference for the object diagrams provided) must contain three classes, A, B, and C, with specific multiplicity relationships among them. Here’s how we deduce the correct object diagram:

• Multiplicity between A and C is "1..2", which means that for each instance of A there must be one or two links to instances of C.
• Multiplicity between B and C is "0..2", which means that for each instance of B there are zero, one, or two links to instances of C.
• Multiplicity between A and B is "0..1", which indicates that for each instance of A there can be zero or one link to an instance of B.

With these rules, we analyze the object diagrams:

• Option Ahas one instance of A linked to two instances of C, which is correct according to the "1..2" multiplicity. However, there are two instances of B (b1 and b2) each linked to a single instance of C (c1), which violates the "0..2" multiplicity rule because it implies there should be two links from c1 to the B instances (b1 and b2) but instead, there are two separate links to the same instance of C (c1), which is not allowed.
• Option Bhas similar issues where two instances of A (a2 and a1) are linked to a single instance of C, which violates the "1..2" multiplicity rule.
• Option Cshows each instance of A and B linked to their own separate instances of C. This violates the "1..2" multiplicity between A and C since there is only one link from A to C and does not show the possibility of two links which the multiplicity "1..2" would allow.
• Option Dshows a single instance of A linked to two instances of C (c1 and c2), which satisfies the "1..2" multiplicity. Additionally, there is a single instance of B linked to one of the instances of C (c1), satisfying the "0..2" multiplicity. The A instance has no direct link to the B instance, which is allowed because the "0..1" multiplicity permits zero links between instances of A and B.

Based on this analysis, the only object diagram that satisfies all the multiplicity constraints of the class diagram isOption D.

The verification of the answer can be cross-checked with the UML 2 Foundation documentation, specifically in the section dealing with object diagrams and their correlation with class diagrams, which will confirm that object diagrams represent instances of classes and must comply with the multiplicities defined in the class diagram they are derived from. Multiplicity notation and interpretation are fundamental concepts in UML and are well documented in the UML specification by the Object Management Group (OMG).

ML 2 Foundation concepts for activity diagrams, there are eight object nodes in total. Here's a breakdown of the elements:

Object Nodes:

• Order: This rectangle near the start of the diagram represents an object node.
• Cust Name: This rectangle following the "Get Customer Details" action is another object node.
• Order Details: This rectangle after the "Get Order Details" action is an object node as well.
• New Order: The rectangle positioned after the decision diamond (approved) is an object node.
• Repeat (text near the decision diamond): This is not an object node. It likely indicates a loopback or repetition, but it doesn't represent an object itself.
• Cust Order: The rectangle after the "Place Order" action is an object node.
• Invoice: The rectangle following the "Create Invoice" action is an object node.
• OrderAck: The rectangle at the end signifies another object node.

Counting the Nodes:

There are eight rectangles that represent object nodes in the diagram (Order, Cust Name, Order Details, New Order, Cust Order, Invoice, OrderAck).

References

• UML 2.5.1 Specification (Superstructure): Sections on Activity Diagrams and Object Nodes https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

In UML, when a class diagram shows an operation with a parameter that has a multiplicity of [0..1], it indicates that the parameter is optional. The range [0..1] means that the parameter can have 0 or 1 occurrence. This does not mean it accepts a collection, nor does it specify the values it accepts (it specifies how many times the parameter can occur).

The correct interpretation of the parameterpar1 : Integer [0..1]is:

A. It is optional.

B is incorrect because the multiplicity [0..1] does not mean a collection of items; rather, it signifies that the parameter can be omitted or present, but not multiple times. C is incorrect because the multiplicity [0..1] does not constrain the values to 0 or 1; it refers to the number of instances of the parameter. D is incorrect because [0..1] is not a range of values but a range of occurrences or instances of the parameter.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. It is optional.

The correct answer is E. 5. Based on the image you provided, the diagram depicts the following sequence of steps involved in creating an order:

• Create Order: This signifies the initiation of the order process.
• Fill Order Request: This step likely involves gathering information or processing details about the order.
• Create Invoice: An invoice is typically generated after an order is finalized.
• Notify Customer: The customer is informed about the order, possibly confirmation or receipt.

The key here is that the process starts with creating the order (step 1) and ends with notifying the customer (step 4). Steps 2 and 3 (filling the order request and creating an invoice) can happen concurrently and don't necessarily follow a specific order in relation to each other.

Therefore, following the logic of the sequence, there are five steps (0-based indexing), making E. 5 the most suitable answer.

Option C shows a UML diagram where a class (One) appears to have an aggregation relationship with itself. In UML, an aggregation is a special type of association that represents a whole-part relationship between the aggregate (whole) and a component part. However, it does not make sense for a class to aggregate itself; such a relationship implies that instances of the same class are parts of each other, which is conceptually invalid.

Let's consider the other options: A) This diagram shows a class contained within another, which is a valid use of nesting classes. B) This diagram shows a composition relationship, which is a form of aggregation with a stronger lifecycle dependency between the whole and the part. This is a valid relationship in UML. D) This diagram shows a class containing two nested classes, one of which contains another nested class. This is also a valid representation of nested classes in UML.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C. Option C

In UML 2, a structured class can have internal parts, which are depicted using 'parts' or 'roles' within the class diagram. These internal parts are used to show the composition of the class in terms of contained classes or components. In the context of the question, the structured class named 'System' contains two parts named 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2'.

Option C is the equivalent definition of 'System' in terms of UML 2 notation for several reasons:

• It represents the structured class 'System' with internal parts correctly labeled as 's1:Subsystem1' and 's2:Subsystem2-[ ]', which indicates the role names 's1' and 's2' followed by the class type 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2' respectively. The notation '1..*' after 's2:Subsystem2-[ ]' suggests a multiplicity, meaning that there can be one or many instances of 'Subsystem2' associated with 'System'.
• The compartmentalization within the structured class is indicative of the composition of the 'System', showing that 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2' are integral parts of the 'System'.
• The notation conforms to the standard UML 2 representation for composite structures, as described in the UML 2 Superstructure Specification, where a class can be broken down into its constituent parts within the class rectangle.

This information is verified against the UML 2 Superstructure Specification, which is the authoritative source for UML notation and semantics. Particularly, this aligns with section 9.3.5 on Composite Structures Diagrams, which details the graphical notation for parts and roles within a structured class.

In the context of the given scenario, the Use Case "Manage customer information" appears to be a general use case that encompasses the functionalities of adding, deleting, and updating customer information. The specific functionalities are represented by separate use cases, namely "Add new customer", "Delete customer", and "Update customer information".

In UML Use Case diagrams, the «include» relationship should be used when a use case implicitly requires the capabilities of another. However, when the use case is a higher-level description that can be further elaborated into more specific use cases, the «extend» relationship is more appropriate, but in the reverse direction as shown in Option B.

Option B correctly uses the generalization relationship which is not depicted by any arrows or lines but by a whole-part structure, indicating that the specific use cases are a part of the general "Manage customer information" use case.

Option A shows the "Manage customer information" use case extending the specific use cases, which is not correct given the context.

Option C incorrectly uses «include» relationships, implying that the "Manage customer information" use case always requires the included use cases.

Option D has the «extend» relationships backward, which is not aligned with the scenario described.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

B. Option B