Free CrowdStrike CCCS-203b Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

The secure and recommended approach to validate whether firewall restrictions are causing CSPM failures is toconfirm that CrowdStrike’s documented IP addresses are allowlisted. Falcon Cloud Security relies on outbound API connectivity to cloud providers, and blocked traffic can disrupt asset inventory collection and IOM detection even if registration succeeds.

CrowdStrike publishes required IP ranges and endpoints for each cloud region. Verifying firewall rules against this documentation is alow-risk, best-practice troubleshooting stepthat preserves security controls while validating connectivity assumptions.

Opening firewalls broadly is insecure and unnecessary, and dismissing firewall-related causes without verification can delay resolution. Therefore, the correct answer isCheck that you have allowlisted the IP addresses provided in the public-facing CrowdStrike documentation.

When protecting a Kubernetes endpoint that hosts container workloadswith access to the Linux kernel, CrowdStrike recommends deploying theFalcon Sensor for Linux as a DaemonSet.

This deployment model installs the full Falcon Linux sensor on each Kubernetes worker node using a DaemonSet, ensuring one sensor runs per node. Because the sensor has kernel-level access, it provides deep visibility into system calls, process execution, network activity, and container behavior—delivering robust runtime protection.

TheFalcon Container Sensor for Linuxis used when kernel access is not available (for example, in managed or restricted environments). TheFalcon Operator Container Imagesimplifies lifecycle management but is not itself the sensor. Deploying the standard Falcon Sensor for Linux outside a DaemonSet would not scale correctly in Kubernetes.

Therefore, for Kubernetes environments with kernel access, the correct and CrowdStrike-recommended installation isFalcon Sensor for Linux deployed as a DaemonSet.

Drift indicators in the Containers dashboard are used to identify containers performing activity that deviates from their original image configuration. Drift occurs when files, binaries, or processes appear in a running container that were not present in the image at build time.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security tracks this behavior to help identify compromised containers, unauthorized changes, or violations of immutability principles. Drift indicators are especially valuable in production environments where containers are expected to remain unchanged after deployment.

Alerts and container detections may signal malicious behavior, but drift indicators specifically highlight unexpected changes relative to the image baseline. Therefore, the correct answer is Drift indicators.

To automate response actions when a vulnerability is discovered in a container image, CrowdStrike Falcon Fusion uses the triggerKubernetes and containers > Image assessment > Vulnerabilities. This trigger activates when Falcon identifies vulnerabilities during container image scanning and assessment.

Image assessment vulnerabilities occurpre-runtime, making this trigger ideal for shift-left security automation. Actions such as sending notifications, opening tickets, tagging images, or blocking deployments via policy enforcement can be automatically initiated before vulnerable images reach production.

TheContainer detectionstrigger applies to runtime events, not image vulnerabilities.Vulnerabilities user actiontriggers depend on manual interaction and are not suitable for automated detection-driven workflows.

By using the image assessment vulnerability trigger, organizations can integrate Falcon Cloud Security findings directly into CI/CD pipelines and remediation workflows, ensuring faster response and reduced risk exposure.

Therefore, the correct Fusion workflow trigger isKubernetes and containers > Image assessment > Vulnerabilities.

A primary benefit of CrowdStrike’s cloud security suite is that it provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention across cloud workloads, identities, containers, and control planes.

Falcon Cloud Security unifies CSPM, workload protection, container security, identity protection, and detection and response into a single platform. This integration allows organizations to detect misconfigurations, prevent risky deployments, monitor runtime activity, and respond to threats using shared context and intelligence.

Other options describe isolated capabilities or services that are not the core value proposition of the platform. Therefore, the correct answer is Provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention.

InCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, preventing a container process from altering its expected behavior is achieved throughcontainer drift preventionenforced by theFalcon Linux sensorat runtime.

Container drift occurs when a running container deviates from its original image state, such as when new binaries are written, files are modified, or unexpected processes execute. Drift is a strong indicator of compromise, misconfiguration, or malicious activity.

By enablingcontainer drift prevention on the Linux sensor, Falcon enforcesruntime immutability, ensuring that containers only execute binaries and processes that were present at image build time. Any unauthorized modifications or executions are either detected or actively blocked, depending on policy configuration.

Creating a custom IOA is not the most effective approach because IOAs are reactive and behavior-based rather than enforcing immutability. The Kubernetes Admission Controller operates at deployment time, not runtime, and cannot prevent post-deployment process changes. Image Assessment policies only affect image deployment decisions and do not control runtime behavior.

Therefore,Option Ais correct because container drift prevention is specifically designed toprotect runtime container integrity, ensuring containers behave exactly as expected throughout their lifecycle.

When remediation capacity is limited,CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityemphasizesrisk-based prioritizationfocused onactual exposurerather than theoretical severity alone.

Filtering vulnerabilities bycontainer running statusallows teams to identify which vulnerable images areactively running and exposed, particularly those that arepublic-facing. Remediating vulnerabilities in running containers first reduces real-world risk immediately, while dormant or unused images can be addressed later.

CVSS scores and CVE age do not account for exploit accessibility or operational exposure. Taking the business offline is impractical and unnecessary when targeted remediation can significantly reduce risk.

Therefore, the correct and CrowdStrike-aligned approach is tofilter by container running status, makingOption Dthe correct answer.