Free Cloud Security Alliance CCSK Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 5

TheCascade-and-filter approachis a method used in cloud security to handle incoming data logs efficiently. It prioritizes logs for threat detection byapplying multiple sequential filters, where each filter progressively narrows down the data. This approach helps in:

Layered threat detection:Early filters eliminate non-critical data, while subsequent filters perform more detailed analysis.

Efficient processing:Reduces the volume of data passed through advanced and resource-intensive filters.

Improved accuracy:Allows focusing on the most relevant security events.

For example, in a cloud environment, the first filter might check for known malicious IP addresses, the second might look for suspicious file types, and subsequent filters may perform behavioral analysis or anomaly detection.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Parallel processing approach:This method processes logs simultaneously, not sequentially, and is less efficient for prioritizing threats.

C. Streamlined single-filter method:Uses a single filter for all data, which lacks depth and thoroughness in identifying complex threats.

D. Unfiltered bulk analysis:This approach is resource-intensive and inefficient, as it does not prioritize or filter logs.

The key outcomes of implementing robust cloud risk management practices focus on ensuring the security and resilience of cloud environments. This involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with the use of cloud services, such as security threats, data privacy issues, and service availability concerns. By adopting strong risk management practices, organizations can better protect their data, ensure business continuity, and maintain compliance with regulations, which ultimately strengthens the overall security and reliability of their cloud environments.

Negotiating shared responsibilities is an important aspect of cloud security but is not the direct outcome of risk management practices. It's about clarifying roles between the customer and provider. Transferring compliance to the cloud service provider via inheritance is not the complete picture. While cloud service providers may help with compliance, the responsibility for compliance and risk management is still shared. Reducing the need for compliance withregulatory requirements is incorrect. Robust risk management practices help ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, not reduce the need for them.

Immutable infrastructure maintains static configurations after deployment, ensuring consistency and preventing unauthorized changes. Reference: [Security Guidance v5, Domain 8 - Cloud Workload Security]

Load balancing is a key resilience strategy in both traditional and cloud environments. It evenly distributes network or application traffic across multiple servers to ensure no single server becomes a point of failure or overloaded, thereby improving system availability, performance, and fault tolerance.

In cloud infrastructure, load balancers may work at various OSI layers (Layer 4 or Layer 7) and are often integrated into cloud platforms as managed services (e.g., AWS Elastic Load Balancer or Azure Load Balancer). They play a critical role in mitigating risks like traffic spikes, system failure, or regional outages.

This technique is described inDomain 7: Infrastructure Securityof the CCSK guidance, which highlights tools like load balancing, redundant systems, and failover mechanisms to support cloud resilience and availability.

In the context of Function as a Service (FaaS), trigger events are primarily defined in addition to the functions themselves. FaaS allows you to run individual functions in response to events, such as HTTP requests, file uploads, database changes, or messages in a queue. These trigger events initiate the execution of the serverless function, making them a core part of FaaS architecture.

Data storage is not directly defined by FaaS, as storage is typically managed separately (e.g., cloud storage or databases). Network configurations are not the main focus of FaaS, since cloud providers manage the underlying network infrastructure. User permissions may be relevant but are typically handled through identity and access management (IAM), not directly tied to the definition of a FaaS function.

Taking snapshots of virtual machines (VMs) is one of the most effective techniques for preserving digital evidence in a cloud environment. Snapshots capture the entire state of a VM, including its memory, configuration, and disk contents at a particular point in time. This allows investigators to preserve evidence as it was at the moment of the incident, enabling detailed analysis without altering the original state of the system.

While isolating the compromised system is important to prevent further damage, snapshots are more directly useful for preserving evidence. Backing up data and analyzing management plane logs are also valuable for incident response, but they don't capture the complete state of a compromised system as effectively as snapshots do.

In a cloud environment that spans multiple jurisdictions, it is crucial to understand the legal and regulatory requirements of each jurisdiction where data originates, is stored, or is processed. Different regions or countries have varying laws, regulations, and compliance standards regarding data privacy, protection, and security. Organizations must ensure they meet all applicable requirements in each jurisdiction to avoid potential legal issues, fines, and reputational damage.

Management Plane Logs are indispensable for security monitoring because they track administrative activities related to the management of cloud resources. These logs capture actions such as user logins, configuration changes, access control modifications, and resource provisioning or decommissioning. By monitoring these logs, organizations can detect unauthorized or suspicious administrative actions, ensuring that only authorized personnel are making changes to critical cloud resources. This helps prevent configuration errors, privilege escalation, and potential attacks targeting the management plane.

Other options refer to different aspects of security monitoring but are not specifically related to the role of Management Plane Logs.