Free Cloud Security Alliance CCSK Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 5

Control objectives are specific goals or outcomes designed to minimize risk and maintain a secure environment. They are part of a broader governance framework and provide clear, measurable targets that organizations aim to achieve in order to meet security, compliance, and operational goals. Control objectives help guide the implementation of security measures and ensure the organization’s security posture aligns with its risk management strategy.

Implementation guidance provides detailed instructions on how to implement controls but does not set specific goals. Policies define the high-level principles and rules that guide behavior and decision-making, but they are more general than control objectives. Control specifications typically define how specific controls are implemented but do not establish the overarching goals that guide risk management.

Custom application-level encryption provides organizations with precise control over what is encrypted and who manages the encryption keys. Unlike network-level encryption, this method allows sensitive fields (e.g., credit card numbers) to be encrypted before data even enters the storage or processing pipeline.

This approach enables compliance with strict data privacy laws and protects data from being decrypted by unauthorized actors—even cloud providers. Organizations can enforce key rotation policies and maintain exclusive key access.

This is detailed in Domain 11: Data Security and Encryption, which recommends application-level encryption for sensitive data protection, particularly in regulated industries.

In federated identity management, the identity provider (IdP) is responsible for authenticating users and making assertions about their identity to the relying party (which could be a service or application that trusts the IdP). The IdP and the relying party establish a trust relationship in advance, which allows the IdP to assert that a user is authenticated, often in the form of security tokens or assertions like SAML or OpenID Connect.

The IdP that authenticates users and makes assertions, not the relying party. The relying party does not make assertions to the IdP; the relying party relies on assertions made by the IdP. The IdP and relying party do have a direct trust relationship in federated identity management.

One of the primary operational challenges associated with using cloud-agnostic container strategies is ensuring management plane compatibility and consistent controls across multiple cloud environments. Cloud-agnostic strategies aim to make containers portable between different cloud providers. However, each cloud provider has its own management tools, APIs, and security controls, which can lead to complexities in maintaining consistent policies, monitoring, and management practices across different cloud environments.

Limiting deployment to a single cloud service is contrary to the goal of a cloud-agnostic strategy, which seeks to avoid reliance on a single cloud provider. Establishing identity and access management protocols is important but not unique to cloud-agnostic strategies; IAM challenges exist regardless of cloud approach. Reducing the amount of cloud storage used is a general optimization concern, not specifically related to cloud-agnostic containers.

When establishing a cloud incident response program, responders need persistent read access to resources, such as logs, configurations, and system data, in order to analyze and investigate incidents effectively. This access allows them to view and understand the nature of the incident, the affected systems, and any potential risks. In critical situations, controlled write access is necessary to take remedial actions, such as stopping malicious processes, patching vulnerabilities, or implementing other immediate security measures, but write access should be restricted and carefully managed to prevent misuse or errors.

Access limited to log events is too restrictive, as responders need more than just log events to fully analyze incidents. Unlimited write access for all responders is too broad and dangerous; unrestricted write access could lead to accidental or malicious changes to critical systems. Full-read access without any approval process could be dangerous if it allows responders too much access without appropriate oversight, potentially violating privacy or security policies.

Data classificationis afundamental security practiceused toprotect sensitive informationbased onrisk, confidentiality, integrity, and regulatory requirements.

Key Factors in Data Classification:

Data Sensitivity:

Organizations classify data based onhow sensitive it is:

Public(e.g., marketing material).

Internal Use Only(e.g., business plans).

Confidential(e.g., financial reports).

Restricted/Highly Confidential(e.g., personal healthcare records, credit card details).

Compliance & Legal Requirements:

Certain data types have strict compliance laws:

PII (Personally Identifiable Information) → GDPR, CCPA

Financial Data → PCI DSS

Healthcare Data → HIPAA

Cloud providers must ensure security policies align with compliance frameworks.

Impact on Security Controls:

Highly sensitive data requires encryption at rest and in transit.

Access control must be enforced with least privilege and IAM policies.

Risk Management:

Properdata classification helps organizations define security policiessuch as:

Retention policies(How long data should be stored?).

Backup and disaster recovery strategies.

This is outlined in:

CCSK v5 - Security Guidance v4.0, Domain 11 (Data Security and Encryption)

Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) - Data Security and Data Classification Standards​

Taking snapshots of virtual machines (VMs) is one of the most effective techniques for preserving digital evidence in a cloud environment. Snapshots capture the entire state of a VM, including its memory, configuration, and disk contents at a particular point in time. This allows investigators to preserve evidence as it was at the moment of the incident, enabling detailed analysis without altering the original state of the system.

While isolating the compromised system is important to prevent further damage, snapshots are more directly useful for preserving evidence. Backing up data and analyzing management plane logs are also valuable for incident response, but they don't capture the complete state of a compromised system as effectively as snapshots do.

The Preparation phase focuses on setting up an incident response team and developing plans to handle incidents efficiently when they occur. Reference: [Security Guidance v5, Domain 11 - Incident Response]