Free CISI UAE-Financial-Rules-and-Regulations Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Evaluators of in-kind shares for investment funds must adhere to key ethical principles including honesty, justice, and confidentiality when collecting data from official authorities. Confidentiality ensures sensitive information obtained during valuation processes is protected against unauthorized disclosure, preserving trust and compliance with legal requirements. This principle complements honesty and justice by maintaining the integrity of the evaluation process and protecting the interests of the fund and its investors. Governance, equality, and prudence are important but not the specifically mandated principles in this context.

According to CISI UAE Financial Rules and Regulations, when in-kind shares are provided at fund inception and the subscription fails, the founders bear the related expenses in the absence of any special agreement. This allocation reflects the founders’ responsibility in establishing and capitalizing the fund and absorbing initial setup costs, including those related to failed subscriptions. Share providers, auditors, or evaluators are not typically liable for such expenses unless contractual terms explicitly assign such responsibility. This regulatory stance encourages clarity and accountability in fund founding arrangements.

Promotional materials for private funds in the UAE must clearly clarify the fund’s specific nature and include the required disclaimer as prescribed by the Authority. This requirement ensures that potential investors receive accurate and compliant information about the private fund’s characteristics, risks, and restrictions. The disclaimer serves to limit investor expectations and legal liabilities. While certain media restrictions and content approvals may apply in some jurisdictions, the key regulatory focus is on transparency and proper disclosure within promotional materials to protect investor interests.

The fifth category licence under UAE financial regulations pertains specifically to credit rating agencies. These entities assess the creditworthiness of issuers of debt, including governments and corporations, and their ratings are critical for investors and markets. The fifth category licence provides the legal framework for credit rating agencies to operate within the UAE’s financial sector, ensuring they meet the regulatory standards and criteria set by the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA). This helps ensure transparency, reliability, and trust in the credit ratings issued, which are vital for maintaining market stability and investor confidence.

Federal Law No. 20 of 2018 and related CISI UAE Financial Rules specify that enhanced customer due diligence procedures require management approval when the client is a politically exposed person (PEP). PEPs present higher risks due to their potential access to public funds and influence, increasing vulnerability to corruption or money laundering. Management approval ensures senior oversight in onboarding and monitoring PEP clients, aligning with international AML/CTF best practices. Other conditions such as residency or age do not mandate this elevated level of scrutiny. This regulatory requirement enhances governance and mitigates reputational and compliance risks associated with politically exposed persons.

Under the UAE Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws and regulations, financial institutions are required to periodically test the effectiveness of their internal policies, controls, and procedures designed to combat money laundering. The independent audit function is specifically responsible for testing and evaluating these AML frameworks. The independent auditor must assess whether the institution's systems and procedures effectively detect, prevent, and report suspicious transactions and activities. This audit ensures that the policies are up-to-date, comprehensive, and compliant with both local and international standards. Regular audits provide an additional layer of scrutiny, ensuring that financial institutions can demonstrate their commitment to preventing money laundering and terrorist financing.

Under Federal Law No. 20 of 2018 and relevant CISI UAE Financial Rules and Regulations, the minimum fine imposed on a person convicted of financing an illegal organisation is AED 150,000. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the UAE treats the crime of funding illegal or terrorist entities. Alongside financial sanctions, convicted individuals may face imprisonment and other legal consequences. These stringent penalties are part of the UAE’s commitment to combating terrorism financing and protecting national and international security.

For India Gold Quanto Futures contracts, the last trading day is defined as two business days prior to the last business day of the delivery month. This rule ensures that there is adequate time for the settlement and adjustment of any open positions before the final day of trading. The two-day buffer also allows for the reconciliation of positions, making the futures market more efficient and reducing the likelihood of disputes regarding settlement. This is in line with global standards for futures contracts where the settlement and final trading days are clearly defined to protect market integrity and investor interests.

Per CISI UAE Financial Rules and Regulations, the watch list monitored by the Authority's committee consists of all public companies that have declared losses in the last 12 months. These companies are subject to closer regulatory scrutiny to protect investors and maintain market stability. Monitoring focuses on financial health indicators that might signal increased risk, ensuring timely intervention if necessary. Private companies are generally not included in this watch list, which targets publicly traded entities with broader investor impact.

According to the Corporate Governance Guide for public joint-stock companies, board members are automatically allowed to accept gifts up to a maximum value of AED 300. This limit is set to ensure that the acceptance of gifts does not raise concerns about conflicts of interest or unethical conduct. By establishing a cap on the value of acceptable gifts, the guide aims to promote transparency and prevent any undue influence on the decision-making process of board members. This helps maintain the integrity of the corporate governance framework and fosters trust among stakeholders.