Free BCS BAPv5 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

The documentation is explicit about how BAMs should be used when multiple stakeholder perspectives exist. It states that initially there will be one BAM for each distinct perspective, and later these models are examined to identify where there is agreement or conflict. The ultimate aim is to combine them and, through discussion with stakeholders, achieve a consensus BAM.

This is important because different stakeholders can hold different (yet valid) “world views” about the same organisation—what the book describes as “duck-rabbit” perspectives—so the analyst must understand and reconcile them to avoid building change based on a single partial view. Once the separate BAMs exist (Finance, Marketing, Logistics, Stores), the next logical step is therefore to facilitate negotiation and collaboration to create one agreed model that represents the idealised way forward and that stakeholders will “buy in” to.

Option A is unnecessary at this point because CATWOE is used to help derive activities and perspectives; the BAMs already exist. Option C (asking the Managing Director to pick) is specifically described as a fallback only if stakeholders cannot agree; it is less desirable than securing shared agreement because it risks lack of acceptance and weaker commitment to the final model.

To identify underlying causes, the analyst needs a technique that helps them explore what is happening in practice and uncover where breakdowns or inefficiencies might be occurring. The documentation describes scenario analysis as “telling the story of a task or transaction,” and explains it is useful when analysing or redesigning processes because it helps staff and analysts work through the steps required, visualise them clearly, and understand what triggers the work and what actions must be completed to achieve a successful outcome.

In a retail setting, declining sales can result from failures or friction in key customer-facing scenarios (e.g., browsing, ordering, returns, stock availability, customer service escalation). By building and walking through scenarios end-to-end, the analyst can pinpoint where delays, handoffs, rework, unclear decision points, or system constraints occur—each of which can contribute to poorer customer outcomes and, ultimately, sales decline. Scenario work also creates a concrete basis for validating hypotheses with stakeholders and for identifying what evidence and data should be gathered next.

The other options are less directly “cause-finding” for the stated problem. A customer journey map focuses on experience and touchpoints (useful, but it may not expose operational root causes in enough detail). Use case diagrams define system interactions for requirements, not root cause diagnosis. A business activity model gives a conceptual “what activities exist” overview; it is valuable for gaps, but scenario analysis is the technique explicitly positioned to walk through transactions to reveal where problems arise.

A Feasibility Study is an assessment of whether a proposed business change or solution is viable and worthwhile. It helps to evaluate the benefits, costs, risks and constraints of different options and recommend the best one for further development. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as preparing a Feasibility Study would be the best activity to undertake before preparing a business case for introducing a new procurement system. A Feasibility Study would help to identify and compare different procurement solutions based on their technical, operational, economic, legal and social feasibility. It would also help to estimate their expected benefits, costs, risks and impacts on the organisation and its stakeholders. A Feasibility Study would provide a solid foundation for preparing a business case that justifies why a particular procurement solution should be selected and implemented. Option B is not a correct answer, as selecting a procurement solution would not be an appropriate activity to undertake before preparing a business case. Selecting a procurement solution would require conducting a Feasibility Study first to evaluate different options and choose the best one based on objective criteria. Selecting a procurement solution without conducting a Feasibility Study would risk choosing an unsuitable or suboptimal solution that may not meet the organisation’s needs or objectives. Option C is not a correct answer, as approving the budget for the new system would not be an appropriate activity to undertake before preparing a business case. Approving the budget for the new system would require preparing a business case first to estimate the costs and benefits of different options and justify why a particular option should be funded and implemented. Approving the budget for the new system without preparing a business case would risk allocating insufficient or excessive funds that may not reflect the value or feasibility of the solution. Option D is not a correct answer, as preparing a Benefits Realisation Report would not be an appropriate activity to undertake before preparing a business case. Preparing a Benefits Realisation Report would require implementing the new system first to measure and evaluate its actual benefits against its expected benefits. Preparing a Benefits Realisation Report without preparing a business case would risk implementing an ineffective or inefficient solution that may not deliver the desired outcomes or benefits.

 A business case is a formal written proposal that details the costs and benefits of a proposed business change or solution. It helps to justify and secure the approval and funding for a proposed business change or solution. A business case typically consists of several elements, such as description of the current situation, analysis of costs and benefits, options considered, recommendations, impact assessment, risk assessment etc. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it identifies which set of elements of a business case will cover all of these points respectively. Description of the current situation is an element that describes the problem or opportunity that exists in the current state and the need or rationale for a change or solution. It helps to explain what is wrong or missing in the current state and what are the objectives and outcomes of a change or solution. This element will cover the point that the threat posed to the organisation from cyber attack, and therefore the justification for the project, needs to be clearly articulated. Analysis of costs and benefits is an element that evaluates the financial and non-financial impacts of a proposed change or solution. It helps to compare and contrast the costs and benefits of different options or solutions and determine their feasibility and desirability. This element will cover the point that the benefits of cyber will be described in quantitative terms, so we will need to describe these qualitatively. Options considered is an element that identifies and describes the alternative ways of addressing a problem or opportunity. It helps to explore and analyse the pros and cons of different options or solutions and select the best one based on criteria and evidence. This element will cover the point that we need to make it clear that we have fully explored the solution market, and we have considered a range of approaches to meeting the objectives of this project. Option B is not a correct answer, as it does not identify which set of elements of a business case will cover all of these points respectively. Impact assessment is an element that assesses the effects or consequences of a proposed change or solution on people, processes, organisation and technology. It helps to identify who or what will be affected by a proposed change or solution and how they will be affected. This element will not cover any of these points. Recommendations is an element that proposes and justifies the preferred option or solution for addressing a problem or opportunity. It helps to persuade and convince decision makers or influencers to approve and fund a proposed change or solution. This element will not cover any of these points. Option C is not a correct answer, as it does not identify which set of elements of a business case will cover all of these points respectively. Recommendations is an element that proposes and justifies the preferred option or solution for addressing a problem or opportunity. It helps to persuade and convince decision makers or influencers to approve and fund a proposed change or solution. This element will not cover any of these points. Risk assessment is an element that identifies and evaluates the uncertainties or threats that may affect a proposed change or solution. It helps to estimate the likelihood and impact of risks and plan how to avoid or mitigate them. This element will not cover any of these points. Option D is not a correct answer, as it does not identify which set of elements of a business case will cover all of these points respectively. Description of the current situation is an element that describes the problem or opportunity that exists in the current state and the need or rationale for a change or solution. It helps to explain what is wrong or missing in the current state and what are the objectives and outcomes of a change or solution. This element will cover the point that the threat posed to the organisation from cyber attack, and therefore the justification for the project, needs to be clearly articulated. Impact assessment is an element that assesses the effects or consequences of a proposed change or solution on people, processes, organisation and technology. It helps to identify who or what will be affected by a proposed change or solution and how they will be affected. This element will not cover any of these points. Risk assessment is an element that identifies and evaluates the uncertainties or threats that may affect a proposed change or solution. It helps to estimate the likelihood and impact of risks and plan how to avoid or mitigate them. This element will not cover any of these points.

CATWOE is a technique that helps to understand different perspectives of a situation by analyzing six elements: Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owner, and Environmental constraints. Shelly could use CATWOE to improve her understanding of the IT and finance director’s views on the future direction of the business, by identifying who are the customers, actors, owners, and so on for each option (organic growth or acquisition), and how they differ. Option A is the correct answer.

Planning activities are those that must be considered beforehand in order to complete the doing and enabling activities. They are usually related to defining or determining some aspects of the business. In this question, the activities c, d and e are planning activities, as they involve defining the skills sets of the consultants, agreeing on a marketing campaign, and running monthly open days. These activities are necessary to support the primary doing activity of delivering consultancy service. Option D is the correct answer.

A brand is a name, term, design, symbol or any other feature that identifies one seller’s good or service as distinct from those of other sellers. A brand perception is how customers and potential customers view a brand based on their experiences, associations and impressions. Therefore, option A is the best choice, as independent industry websites are likely to provide unbiased and reliable information on how customers perceive different brands in the market. They may also include customer reviews, ratings and feedback that can help measure customer satisfaction and loyalty. Option B is not a good choice, as the company website is likely to provide biased and selective information on its own brand that may not reflect how customers actually perceive it. It may also omit negative aspects or criticisms that could affect its image or reputation. Option C is not a good choice, as the company’s organisational structure is not relevant to its brand perception. It may show how the company is organised internally, but it does not indicate how customers view its products or services externally. Option D is not a good choice, as the company’s complaints procedures are not sufficient to measure its brand perception. They may show how the company handles customer issues or problems, but they do not capture how customers feel about its overall quality or value.

A logical dependency arrow on a BAM shows that one activity depends on another activity for its completion or initiation. In this question, the doing activity of ‘sell bespoke kitchens’ depends on the planning activity of ‘determine range of products’, as the customers need to select products from a predefined range when they design their kitchens. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

Findings (1)–(3) map directly to the Resource Audit, which analyses organisational capability across tangible and intangible resources. The glossary definition states that the resource audit considers tangible resources (physical, financial, human) and intangible resources such as know-how and reputation. The text also explicitly notes that intangible resources can include patents or trademarks and that another key intangible resource is reputation/brand beliefs about quality. Therefore: reputation for quality (1) and trademark registration (2) are intangible resources; approved budget for research (3) is a financial resource—together strongly indicating a resource audit.

Finding (4) about KPIs “created to monitor success factors” is most consistent with a VMOST/MOST-style review of mission/objectives and how success is measured. The text defines Mission and Objectives as the basis for what the organisation is trying to achieve, and performance measurement is commonly derived from objectives and critical success factors (CSFs), which are then monitored with KPIs. While SWOT, Stakeholder Wheel, and PESTLE can support broader analysis, they do not specifically generate findings about internal capability resources (reputation, trademarks, budget) and the creation of KPIs linked to success factors in the way Resource Audit plus VMOST/MOST review does.

The business case guidance states that risk assessment should identify principal risks and—critically—define countermeasures: what can be done to reduce the likelihood of the risk occurring or lessen its impact. It notes that some risks can be transferred (e.g., via insurance), but the key is choosing countermeasures that actually address the cause.

Here, the risk is behavioural: managers may struggle to adopt a new management style required by the change. The book explicitly recognises that business change often requires changes to working practices and sometimes management style, especially where roles and authority shift. The most direct countermeasure is to build capability and readiness in the affected managers—through training, education, coaching, and support—so they understand the new behaviours, can practise them, and can be reinforced through agreed expectations. This reduces both the probability of failure (managers not changing) and the impact (inconsistent adoption harming productivity).

Option A (insurance) does not address behavioural adoption; it might transfer financial impact in some scenarios but won’t make managers change. Option C explicitly avoids change and therefore cannot mitigate the stated risk. Option B could work in extreme cases, but replacing the entire management team is a far more disruptive and costly response than necessary and is not the “most likely” effective countermeasure when the risk is capability/behaviour adoption. Therefore, training and educating the managers is the most appropriate countermeasure.