Free APSE CESP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

 People First Language is a way of communicating respectfully and appropriately with and about people with disabilities. It puts the person before the diagnosis, describing what condition a person “has” rather than asserting what a person “is”. It avoids using labels or adjectives that define or dehumanize someone based on their disability. Forexample, instead of saying “a diabetic”, we can say “a person with diabetes”. This way, we emphasize the person’s individuality, personhood, and dignity, not their disability.

In the given options, only D. He is a person with autism follows the People First Language. It refers to the person first, and then to the condition that he has. The other options use offensive, insensitive, or outdated terms that imply negative stereotypes or limitations. For example, A. He is disabled suggests that the person is defined by his disability, and does not acknowledge his abilities or potential. B. She is brain damaged is a derogatory and inaccurate term that does not respect the person’s cognitive or intellectual abilities. C. She is confined to a wheelchair implies that the person is trapped or restricted by their mobility device, rather than empowered or assisted by it. References: 

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/materials/factsheets/fs-communicating-with-people.html

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/science-health-public-trust/perspectives/writing-respectfully-person-first-identity-first-language

 The LEAST appropriate response is to discuss this with him publicly so that his co-workers and manager know that you have addressed the concern. This would violate his right to privacy and dignity, and could also damage his relationships with his colleagues and employer. It could also increase his stress and anxiety, which could worsen his behavior. A better approach would be to speak with him privately and respectfully, and try to understand the reasons behind his rudeness. You could also observe him at work and provide feedback and support as needed. You could also ask the manager how she normally handles discipline with her employees and encourage her to treat him like everyone else, as long as it is fair and consistent. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.2: Provide ongoing support to the individual and employer to maintain employment, Knowledge of 4.2.1: Strategies for providing feedback and support to the individual and employer
• CESP- ASPE Flashcards, card 66, Job Coaching, Definition: The process of providing on-the-job training and support to individuals with disabilities to help them learn and perform the work and adjust to the work environment.

 The least effective question to ask is “How do you feel about employing people with disabilities?” This is because this question is not relevant to the purpose of an informational interview, which is to gather information about the business, the industry, the job requirements, and the employer’s needs1. Asking this question may also create a negative impression of the job developer and the job seeker, as it may imply that the job seeker is not qualified or capable of performing the job, or that the employer has a bias or prejudice against people with disabilities2. Furthermore, this question may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits employers from asking disability-related questions before making a job offer3.

References:

• 1: Informational Interviewing: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: Job Development Dos and Don’ts2
• 3: Pre-Employment Inquiries and the ADA3

Completing the job tasks for the individual is not a helpful training technique, because it does not promote the individual’s learning, independence, or self-confidence. It may also reinforce the individual’s frustration and dependence on others. Instead, a better approach would be to provide positive reinforcement, break down the task into smaller steps, use prompts and cues, and offer feedback and support12. References: 1: CESP™ - Association of People Supporting Employment First 2: Computer-Assisted Cognitive Re-Training as An Intervention for Children …

Natural supports are methods of inclusion and assistance that exist in any given workplace, and that an employee with a disability can tap into1. These supports help the person to perform their role, and also to feel socially included, which is crucial for highperformance and job retention1. Natural supports can involve people, procedures, customs, tools, and benefits that are typically available in the workplace, along with individualized supports seen as normative within the setting1. Some examples of natural supports are mentoring, friendship, socializing, providing feedback, or reminding12.

Among the four options, only C involves a natural support that can help the 19-year-old female feel more connected and confident in the workplace. By finding a co-worker who can empathize with, mentor, and support her on the job, she can benefit from the guidance, encouragement, and friendship of someone who understands the work environment and culture. This can also help her to develop her skills, overcome her challenges, and integrate into the social network of the workplace12.

Option A is not a natural support, but a paid support that may create a barrier between the employee and her co-workers. It may also send a message that she cannot do the job without a support person, and hinder her independence and self-esteem2. Option B is also not a natural support, but a personal support that may blur the boundaries between the professional and personal relationship. It may also create a dependency onthe supervisor, and prevent the employee from seeking help from other sources3. Option D is not a workplace support, but a clinical support that may not address the specific needs and goals of the employee in relation to her work. It may also stigmatize the employee, and make her feel more isolated and anxious4.

References:

• 1: The Importance of Natural Supports - ThinkWork
• 2: The Case for Natural Supports in the Workplace
• 3: Natural Supports - Project 10
• 4: Workplace Mental Health - Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada

 The best option for the employment support professional to do is to recommend the family consult with a benefits specialist. A benefits specialist is someone who can provide accurate and individualized information on how work and earnings may affect the student’s eligibility for SSI and other public benefits, such as Medicaid, food stamps, or housing assistance. A benefits specialist can also explain the various work incentives and programs that are available to help the student transition to work without losing essential benefits and supports. For example, the student may qualify for the student earned income exclusion, which allows a student under age 22 and regularly attending school to exclude some or all of their earnings from income when determining their SSI benefit amount12. A benefits specialist can also help the student and the family plan for future goals and needs, such as saving for education, training, or assistive technology.

The other options are not appropriate for the employment support professional to do because:

• A. Advising the family that the student is required to work as part of the transition plan may be seen as coercive or insensitive to the family’s concerns and fears. It may also create conflict or resistance between the family and the school or the employment support professional. The student’s transition plan should be based on the student’s preferences, interests, needs, and strengths, and should involve the collaboration and agreement of all parties involved, including the student, the family, the school, and the employment support professional.
• B. Informing the family that the student can work 15 hours per week without affecting benefits and insurance may be inaccurate or misleading, as the impact of work and earnings on benefits and insurance may vary depending on the student’s individual situation and the type and amount of income they receive. It may also be insufficient to address the family’s concerns and questions, as they may need more detailed and specific information on how work and earnings may affect the student’s current and future benefits and supports.
• C. Agreeing with the family that the student who has SSI cannot work may be discouraging or limiting for the student’s potential and opportunities. It may also be contrary to the core values and principles of the employment support professional, which include promoting the inclusion, empowerment, and self-determination of people with disabilities in the workforce and society. It may also be inconsistent with the evidence and best practices that show that people with disabilities can work and achieve positive outcomes with appropriate supports and accommodations. References:
• SSI Spotlight on Student Earned Income Exclusion
• SSI Rules for College Students

The BEST solution to resolve this problem is to request a noise-canceling headset from the employer. This would help the employee to focus on the callers and block out the distracting sounds around her. It would also be a low-cost and reasonable accommodation that the employer could provide. The other options are not as effective or feasible because:

• A. Referring her to vocational rehabilitation would not address the immediate issue of noise in the workplace. It would also imply that she needs to change her career or find a different job, which may not be her preference or goal.
• B. Referring her to occupational therapy for further evaluations would also not address the immediate issue of noise in the workplace. It would also involve additional costs and time for the employee and the employer, and may not result in any useful recommendations or solutions.
• D. Moving her to an office away from her co-workers would not be a low-cost solution, as it would require rearranging the office space and possibly affecting the productivity and morale of other employees. It would also isolate her from her team and reduce her opportunities for social interaction and support. References:
• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.1: Identify and implement accommodations and supports to meet the needs of the individual and employer, Knowledge of 4.1.1: Types of accommodations and supports
• CESP- ASPE Flashcards, card 67, Reasonable Accommodation, Definition: Any change or adjustment to a job or work environment that permits a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the job application process, to perform the essential functions of a job, or to enjoy benefits and privileges of employment equal to those enjoyed by employees without disabilities.

The core pre-employment transition requirement that is met when teaching a student about disclosing a disability is self-advocacy. Self-advocacy is one of the five required activities that VRagencies must provide to students with disabilities under the WIOA regulations. Self-advocacy includes instruction in self-awareness, disability disclosure, requesting accommodations, understanding rights and responsibilities, and self-determination. Teaching a student about disclosing a disability helps them to make informed choices about whether, when, how, and to whom to disclose their disability, and to understand the potential benefits and consequences of doing so. Disclosing a disability is a personal decision that may affect the student’s access to services, supports, and opportunities in education, employment, and other settings. References: RSA Frequently-Asked Questions about Pre-Employment Transition Services, Pre-Employment Transition Services (Pre-ETS): The Five Required Activities for Students with Disabilities, Disclosing a Disability to an Employer: Your Rights, Disclosing an invisible disability

The best advocacy for Carl to receive bus training is to assist him to meet with his team and his parents to discuss city bus training, then plan and prepare for the city bus training. This option respects Carl’s right to self-determination and empowerment, as well as his parents’ concerns and involvement. It also allows for a collaborative and individualized approach to address Carl’s transportation needs and goals. The other options are either disrespectful, dishonest, or ineffective in promoting Carl’s independence and inclusion in the generalworkforce. References: https://cesp.helpscoutdocs.com/article/637-cesp-examination-content-outline

https://apse.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CESP-Practice-Exam-8-2.pdf

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the knowledge areas for Domain 3: Community Research and Job Development is “Strategies for marketing job seekers to employers”. The handbook also states that “The CESP exam is based on the application of knowledge, not just the recall of facts”. Therefore, the best answer is the one that demonstrates the most effective and evidence-based practice for presenting a person’s experience to a potential employer.

Option C is the best answer because a visual portfolio is a collection of work samples, photos, videos, or other materials that showcase a person’s skills, abilities, and achievements in a concrete and appealing way2. A visual portfolio can help anemployment support professional to highlight the person’s strengths and interests, match them to the employer’s needs and expectations, and address any possible concerns or questions that the employer may have3.

Option A is not the best answer because a social networking account may not be relevant or appropriate for demonstrating a person’s experience in a professional context. A social networking account may contain personal or private information that the person may not want to share with a potential employer, or that may create a negative impression of the person’s character or suitability for the job4.

Option B is not the best answer because a job analysis is a tool that an employment support professional uses to gather information about the tasks, duties, skills, and requirements of a specific job. A job analysis is not a resource that can demonstrate a person’s experience, but rather a method that can help identify the best fit between a person and a job.

Option D is not the best answer because an individualized employment plan is a document that outlines the goals, objectives, strategies, and supports that a person and an employment support professional agree to pursue in order to achieve successful employment outcomes. An individualized employment plan is not a resource that can demonstrate a person’s experience, but rather a plan that can guide the process of finding and maintaining a job.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook 2: Visual Portfolios: A Tool for Marketing Job Seekers 3: Using Visual Portfolios to Market Job Seekers 4: Social Media and Employment : Job Analysis: An Overview : Individualized Employment Plan (IEP)