Free AGA CGFM Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

What Are Open-Ended Mutual Funds?

Open-ended mutual funds are investment vehicles that allow investors to buy and sell shares at the current net asset value (NAV), which is determined daily.

These funds are highly liquid and can be easily valued, making them a sound investment option for pension funds.

Why Are They Suitable for Pension Funds?

Pension funds require investments that are easily valued, transparent, and provide liquidity to meet benefit obligations. Open-ended mutual funds meet all these criteria.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Reverse repurchase agreements:While they can be part of investment strategies, they are not easily valued compared to open-ended mutual funds.

C. Derivative instruments:Derivatives can be complex and difficult to value, making them less suitable for pension funds that prioritize transparency and simplicity.

D. Internal investment pools:These are investment vehicles used by governments, but their valuation may not be as straightforward or frequent as mutual funds.

References and Documents:

GAO Guide to Investment Management for Pension Funds:Recommends transparent, easily valued investments like mutual funds.

AICPA Pension Plan Audit Guidelines:Emphasizes liquidity and valuation in pension fund investments.

National Performance Management Advisory Commission Framework:

TheNational Performance Management Advisory Commissiondeveloped a comprehensive framework to integrateperformance measurementinto government operations.

One of its primary goals was to incorporate performance metrics into thebudget processto align resource allocation with program outcomes.

This ensures that budgeting decisions are informed by program performance, improving efficiency and accountability.

Why the Budget Process?

By linking performance to budgeting, governments can prioritize funding for programs that demonstrate effectiveness and reduce funding for underperforming initiatives.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Internal control plan:Internal controls focus on risk management, not incorporating performance measurement.

B. Financial statements:Performance metrics are not reported in financial statements, which focus on financial position and results.

C. Audit procedures:Audits verify financial accuracy and compliance but do not incorporate performance measurement.

References and Documents:

National Performance Management Advisory Commission Report (2010):Recommends integrating performance measurement into the budget process.

GAO Guide on Performance Budgeting:Explains how performance metrics inform budget decisions.

Definition of Internal Control (According to GAO):

Internal control is aprocess implemented by managementto provide reasonable assurance that the organization will achieve its objectives in:

Operations(effectiveness and efficiency).

Reporting(reliable and accurate financial and non-financial reporting).

Compliance(adherence to laws and regulations).

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Help an entity achieve its objectives: Correct. This is the primary purpose of internal controls.

B. Design an ERM system: Incorrect. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is broader than internal control and includes risk strategy and appetite.

C. Set the tone at the top: Incorrect. While the tone at the top is part of the control environment, it is not the full scope of internal control.

D. Develop a strategic plan: Incorrect. Internal control supports strategic plans but is not directly involved in developing them.

References:

GAO,Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book).

COSO,Internal Control - Integrated Framework.

What Does the Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA) Do?

CMIA governs the transfer of federal funds to state governments and ensures timely and efficient use of these funds.

If federal agencies fail to provide funds for entitlements (e.g., Medicaid) in a timely manner, CMIA requires them to payinterestto state governments for the delays.

This ensures states are compensated for any financial burden caused by delayed federal transfers.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Debt Collection Improvement Act:Focuses on improving debt collection practices for the federal government, not entitlements or interest payments to states.

B. CFO Act:Improves federal financial management but does not address payment timeliness or interest.

C. Accountability for Tax Dollars Act:Expands audit requirements but does not involve compensation for delays.

References and Documents:

CMIA (1990):Requires federal agencies to pay interest on late entitlement payments to states.

Treasury Financial Manual:Details CMIA interest payment provisions.

What Is an Outcome Measure?

Anoutcome measureevaluates the results or impacts of a program or service, focusing on whether objectives were achieved (e.g., efficiency, effectiveness, or quality).

Percentage of disaster claims paid on timedirectly reflects the program’s ability to meet its goal of providing timely financial assistance to disaster victims, making it an outcome measure.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Amount of disability inquiries received during a pandemic:This is aninput measure, as it reflects the demand or workload, not the results.

B. Total environmental impact statements reviewed:This is anoutput measure, showing the quantity of work done, not the effectiveness or result.

C. Number of federal capital territory students that graduated:While this measures results, it reflects an output rather than an outcome (it doesn’t assess the quality or long-term impact of education).

References and Documents:

Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA):Emphasizes the use of outcome measures to evaluate program performance.

GAO Performance Measurement Guide:Defines and provides examples of outcome, output, and input measures.

Collusion as a Threat to Monitoring:

Collusion occurs when two or more individuals work together to circumvent internal controls.

Even with strong controls in place, collusion can undermine monitoring because it allows individuals to bypass controls without detection.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Theft has occurred: Incorrect. While theft is a problem, it is often detected if controls and monitoring are functioning properly.

B. Financial data is inaccurate: Incorrect. Inaccurate financial data can compromise decision-making, but strong monitoring can help detect and correct errors.

C. Performance data is inaccurate: Incorrect. While inaccurate performance data is problematic, it does not directly compromise the monitoring of financial control weaknesses.

D. Collusion is present: Correct. Collusion is the most significant threat because it undermines the effectiveness of internal controls and makes monitoring ineffective.

References:

GAO,Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book).

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE),Fraud Risk Management Framework.

Purpose of the Analysis:A finance director needs to assess whether the organization has enough funds available to cover short-term obligations (bills due within 30 days). This requires evaluating liquidity.

Explanation of Key Ratios:

Quick/Current Ratio: Measures an entity’s ability to pay its short-term liabilities using liquid assets.

Current Ratio= Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities.

Quick Ratioexcludes less liquid assets (e.g., inventory), focusing on assets that can quickly convert to cash.This is the appropriate measure for assessing immediate liquidity.

Receivables Turnover Ratio: Measures how efficiently receivables are collected but doesn’t directly evaluate liquidity for bills due within 30 days.

Budgetary Cushion Ratio: Refers to financial reserves relative to annual spending, not short-term liquidity.

Debt Burden Ratio: Evaluates debt relative to revenues but does not address immediate cash flow needs.

References:

Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA),Liquidity Management Best Practices.

Association of Government Accountants (AGA),Financial Statement Analysis for Government Finance Officers.

What Is GPRA?TheGovernment Performance and Results Act (GPRA)of 1993 was designed to improve the performance of federal programs by requiring federal agencies to establish goals, measure performance, and report on their progress.

Stated Purposes of GPRA:

Improve Service Delivery (Option A):GPRA helps agencies align performance goals with customer needs, improving service delivery.

Improve Internal Management Practices (Option B):By requiring performance metrics and evaluations, GPRA enhances internal management and decision-making processes.

Improve Program Effectiveness (Option D):GPRA aims to make federal programs more effective by fostering accountability and linking resources to results.

Why Option C Is Incorrect:

GPRA does not provide detailedinstructions on program reporting.While it requires agencies to report on their performance, it does not dictate the specific steps or instructions for reporting. Instead, agencies design their own reporting processes within the GPRA framework.

References and Documents:

Government Performance and Results Act of 1993:Stipulates the law’s objectives but does not mention program reporting instructions.

GAO Report on GPRA Implementation:Highlights GPRA’s purpose to improve performance management and accountability without prescribing reporting instructions.

What Does OMB Circular A-50 Require?

OMB Circular A-50establishes policies for resolving and following up on audit findings and recommendations. It assignspersonal responsibilityto anaudit follow-up officialwithin the agency for ensuring that disagreements with audit findings are resolved and that corrective actions are implemented.

Why Is the Audit Follow-Up Official Responsible?

The follow-up official ensures the agency responds appropriately to audit findings, tracks corrective actions, and resolves disagreements in a timely manner. This ensures accountability and compliance with audit recommendations.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Comptroller General:The Comptroller General leads the GAO and oversees audits but is not responsible for resolving disagreements within agencies.

B. OMB Deputy Director for Management:Provides guidance on audit policies but does not hold personal responsibility for resolving disagreements.

C. Inspector General:Performs audits and investigations but does not resolve disagreements over audit findings.

References and Documents:

OMB Circular A-50:Specifies that the audit follow-up official holds responsibility for resolving disagreements.

GAO Yellow Book:Discusses the roles and responsibilities of various officials in audit processes.

What Is an Attestation Engagement?An attestation engagement is a type of professional service where an independent practitioner (typically an auditor or CPA) evaluates and provides a report on assertions made by another party about a specific subject matter. These engagements follow standards set by organizations like the AICPA or GAO.

Who Makes the Assertion?

Management's Role:Management is the party responsible for making an assertion about the subject matter under review. For example, management might assert that internal controls are effective or that financial statements are fairly presented.

Auditor/Practitioner’s Role:The auditor or practitioner examines the evidence related to the assertion and provides an opinion or conclusion based on that examination.

User’s Role:The users are the stakeholders (e.g., investors, regulators) who rely on the practitioner’s report, but they do not make assertions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Auditor/Practitioner:The auditor or practitioner evaluates the assertion made by management, not the other way around.

C. Practitioner:See above—practitioners don’t make assertions.

D. User:Users are the intended audience of the attestation report, not the party making assertions.

References and Documents:

AICPA Attestation Standards (SSAEs):Clarifies the role of management in making assertions during attestation engagements.

GAO’s Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book):Provides additional guidance on the roles of parties in attestation engagements.