Free AAPC CPC Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 3

The lesion is a benign congenital hairy nevus → benign lesion excision codes (11400–11446)

Location: thigh (trunk/arms/legs)

Excision size with margins = 4.5 cm → 11406 (4.1–5.0 cm)

Closure length = 5 cm, layered closure with limited undermining → intermediate repair

12032 = Intermediate repair, trunk/extremities, 2.6–7.5 cm

Modifier -51 applies to the secondary procedure

To determine the correct anesthesia code for a cesarean delivery with specific conditions, we review the following codes:

01961 is defined as "Anesthesia for cesarean delivery only," which aligns with this scenario, as the patient is admitted for a cesarean section.

01960 refers to anesthesia for a vaginal delivery, which does not apply here as the delivery is via cesarean.

01967 is for "Anesthesia for planned vaginal delivery," which also does not apply due to the cesarean route.

01958 is used for planned vaginal delivery that may involve a complicated scenario, but since the procedure is a cesarean section, this code is not appropriate.

Given that the patient is in labor for a cesarean section and has had a previous external cephalic version, 01961 is the correct answer.

Burn coding requires (1) code each burn site bylocation, laterality, and degree, and (2) add aTBSAcode when appropriate. The patient hasthird-degree burnsof both thighs (right and left), so the correct site/degree codes areT24.311A(third-degree burn of right thigh, initial encounter) andT24.312A(third-degree burn of left thigh, initial encounter). He also hassecond-degree burnsof the right anterior chest wall and the upper back, reported withT21.21XA(second-degree burn of chest wall, initial encounter) andT21.23XA(second-degree burn of back wall, initial encounter). TBSA is24%(falls in the 20–29% category), andthird-degree is 10%(falls in the 10–19% third-degree category), so the correct TBSA code isT31.21. Option D matches the required site/degree codes and the correct TBSA/third-degree percentage code pairing.

99222 = Initial hospital inpatient care, moderate MDM

Extensive diagnostic workup → moderate complexity

Final diagnosis established during admission

Diagnosis Coding:

G00.9 – Bacterial meningitis, unspecified

Do not code symptoms (fever, neck pain) once definitive diagnosis is confirmed

Why others are incorrect:

99284 – ED visit

99264 – Inpatient consultation (deleted code)

Symptom-only diagnosis codes inappropriate

The CPT code 12002 is used for simple repair of superficial wounds of 2.5 cm or less. This code includes the repair of both the 3 cm laceration on the right arm and the 2 cm laceration on the nose as both are simple repairs. The other options suggest more complex repairs or multiple separate procedures, which are not necessary in this scenario.

AMA's CPT® Professional Edition (current year)

CPT® code 15786 is used for abrasion treatment of a single lesion (e.g., for keratosis) through techniques like dermabrasion (lightly sanding the skin's surface). When treating multiple lesions in this manner, each lesion treated should be coded individually.

Since the patient has 5 keratosis lesions treated through sanding, 15786 x 5 accurately represents the procedure for each lesion.

Explanation of other options:

A. 15787 x 5: Incorrect because 15787 is designated for dermabrasion of "additional lesions" and would be used in conjunction with 15786, not alone.

B. 15786, 15787: Incorrect, as it does not account for all five lesions treated.

C. 15786, 15787 x 4: Incorrect, as 15787 is used only when performed in addition to 15786, not as a replacement for each additional lesion.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. 15786 x 5, which accurately reports the treatment of all five lesions.

The operative service is anamputation of the left third toe at the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. CPT28820describes toe amputationthrough the MTP joint, matching the “amputation at the metatarsophalangeal joint” language and the incision encircling the joint with removal of the toe after dividing tendons/ligaments. ModifierT2correctly identifies theleft foot, third digit. Diagnosis coding must capture the ischemic disease withgangreneplus thenon-pressure chronic ulceron the toe. In the answer set,I70.262represents lower-extremity atherosclerosis/PVDwith gangrene(left side per the option). The chronic ulcer is separately reported using the providedL97.528non-pressure ulcer code for the left foot/toe severity category offered by the choices. Antibiotic prophylaxis (Ancef), anesthesia type, tourniquet use/time, and technique details support the procedure but do not change the core CPT/ICD-10-CM selection. Therefore, the correct combination is28820-T2, I70.262, L97.528.

In ICD-10-CM coding, an Excludes2 note under a code indicates that the condition listed in the note is not included in the definition of the code, but it does not necessarily mean they cannot coexist. This type of note means that while the conditions are distinct, it may be appropriate to report both codes if a patient has both conditions at the same time.

A. is incorrect because Excludes1, not Excludes2, indicates that certain codes should not be reported together.

C. is a description of an Excludes1 note, which implies that the two conditions should not be coded together because they cannot occur simultaneously.

D. is also a description of an Excludes1 note, which serves as a "NOT CODED HERE!" directive.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. It is acceptable to report both the code and the excluded code together, when applicable.

Observation E/M coding is chosen by thetype of serviceprovided on each calendar date. Day 1 includes initiation of observation with significant work (IV insulin drip, multiple labs, discussion with endocrinologist), supporting an observation initial care code. In this option set,99235represents an observation “admit and discharge on same date” style service; however, the patient stays multiple days. The question’s answer choices are structured around using99235as the initial observation care code offered, then a subsequent observation code for day 2, and a discharge code for day 3. Day 2 includes ongoing management with documented time of 25 minutes, supporting asubsequent observation carecode such as99231(as provided). Day 3 isobservation discharge, which is99238(30 minutes or less) given the documented 15 minutes. While the most current observation framework in CPT has evolved, the CPC-style expected pattern in these choices is99235 (initial), 99231 (subsequent), 99238 (discharge). Therefore, optionBmatches the intended coding sequence across the observation stay dates.

1. Procedure and CPT® Code Selection:

The cardiologist provided remote monitoring over a 30-day period for a hemodynamic pulmonary artery pressure monitor implanted in a patient with congestive heart failure.

CPT® Code 93264 is appropriate for remote monitoring of a hemodynamic system for up to 30 days. This code includes services such as weekly data transmissions, interpretation, trend analysis, and reporting—exactly as described in this case.

2. Rationale for Excluding Other Options:

Code 93286 is for in-person interrogation and programming of pacemakers or defibrillators, not for remote monitoring of a hemodynamic monitor, making it incorrect.

Code 93288 is for interrogation device evaluation (remote), specifically for pacemakers or defibrillators, and does not apply to a pulmonary artery pressure monitor.

Code 93279 is for in-person programming of certain cardiac devices, which does not match the remote monitoring described in this scenario.

3. AAPC and CPT® Coding Guidelines:

AAPC and CPT® guidelines specify that 93264 is the correct code when reporting remote hemodynamic monitoring for a pulmonary artery pressure device over a period of up to 30 days, including data review and interpretation.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. 93264.