Free IIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

An ethnocentric attitude in global business means that the parent company (headquarters) makes all key decisions and expects its foreign subsidiaries to follow directives without much autonomy. This approach often results in centralized control, standardized policies, and minimal local input.

(A) Standards used for evaluation and control are determined at local subsidiaries, not set by headquarters.

Incorrect. In an ethnocentric organization, standards and controls are determined by headquarters, not by local subsidiaries.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management emphasizes that corporate governance should ensure consistent policies across all locations, which aligns with ethnocentric approaches.

(B) Orders, commands, and advice are sent to the subsidiaries from headquarters. ✅

Correct. In ethnocentric organizations, decision-making authority is centralized at headquarters, and subsidiaries are expected to follow orders and policies without deviation.

IIA GTAG "Auditing Global Operations" discusses risks related to centralized control structures, where headquarters enforces policies globally.

(C) People of local nationality are developed for the best positions within their own country.

Incorrect. This describes a polycentric approach, where local talent is developed for leadership roles. Ethnocentric organizations prefer to assign expatriates from headquarters to key positions in subsidiaries.

(D) There is a significant amount of collaboration between headquarters and subsidiaries.

Incorrect. Collaboration is more common in geocentric or regiocentric models, where decision-making is shared. Ethnocentric organizations have limited collaboration, as headquarters dictates policies.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing Global Operations"

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management

COSO Framework – Internal Control and Corporate Governance

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is B, as ethnocentric organizations enforce top-down control, sending orders, commands, and advice to subsidiaries.

Understanding the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC):

The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) measures the time taken for a company to convert raw materials into cash flow.

CCC is calculated using the formula: CCC=DaysInventoryOutstanding(DIO)+DaysSalesOutstanding(DSO)−DaysPayableOutstanding(DPO)CCC = Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) + Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) - Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)CCC=DaysInventoryOutstanding(DIO)+DaysSalesOutstanding(DSO)−DaysPayableOutstanding(DPO)

Where:

DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) = 55 days (time to convert raw materials to finished products).

DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) = 42 days (time to collect receivables).

DPO (Days Payable Outstanding) = 10 days (time to pay for raw materials).

Applying the Formula:

CCC=55+42−10CCC = 55 + 42 - 10CCC=55+42−10 CCC=100 daysCCC = 100 \text{ days}CCC=100 days

Why Option C (100 Days) Is Correct?

The CCC represents the time the company’s cash is tied up in production and sales before receiving payment.

This calculation aligns with IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management, which requires auditors to assess financial liquidity and operational efficiency.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (26 days): Incorrect calculation.

Option B (90 days): Does not subtract DPO correctly.

Option D (110 days): Incorrect addition of all components instead of following the CCC formula.

The correct cash conversion cycle is 100 days, calculated using standard CCC methodology.

IIA Standard 2120 and financial management principles confirm the correct calculation.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Financial Performance & Liquidity Risk)

COSO ERM – Working Capital & Cash Flow Management

Financial Management Best Practices – Cash Conversion Cycle Analysis

In the data analytics process, the first step after obtaining data is to ensure its completeness and accuracy. If data is incomplete or inaccurate, the entire analysis process is compromised, leading to unreliable results.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Verify completeness and accuracy.

Correct.

Completeness ensures that all necessary data points are included, preventing missing or incomplete datasets.

Accuracy ensures that data values are correct and free from errors, ensuring reliability for analysis.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors use data validation techniques to confirm completeness and accuracy before analysis. (IIA GTAG: Auditing with Data Analytics)

Option B: Verify existence and accuracy.

Incorrect. While existence is important (ensuring data is valid and not fabricated), completeness is more critical in the initial step to avoid missing data.

Option C: Verify completeness and integrity.

Incorrect. Integrity refers to the reliability and consistency of data across systems, which is a later step after verifying completeness and accuracy.

Option D: Verify existence and completeness.

Incorrect. Existence is less relevant at the initial stage than accuracy, which is crucial for avoiding misinterpretation of results.

Thus, the verified answer is A. Verify completeness and accuracy.

Understanding BYOD Risks:

A Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) policy allows employees to use personal devices (e.g., laptops, smartphones, tablets) for work.

This increases security risks such as unauthorized access, malware infections, data leakage, and non-compliance with IT security policies.

Why Option C (Detection and Authentication Controls) Is Correct?

Detection and authentication controls ensure that:

Only authorized devices can connect to the organization's network.

User authentication mechanisms (such as multi-factor authentication) verify identities before granting access.

Devices with security vulnerabilities are flagged and restricted.

This aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which emphasizes IT security controls for risk mitigation.

ISO 27001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework also recommend device authentication and monitoring for secure network access.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Limit personal use of employee devices):

Limiting personal use does not fully address network security risks; malware can still infect devices.

Option B (Control access through approvals and reviews):

While access control is important, it does not mitigate the broader risks of compromised devices connecting to the network.

Option D (Software scans and patch reminders):

Patching is important, but it does not prevent unauthorized access or ensure authentication for devices.

Implementing device detection and authentication controls is the most effective way to mitigate security risks in a BYOD environment.

IIA Standard 2110 and ISO 27001 emphasize strong network security measures.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (IT Risk Management & BYOD Security)

ISO 27001 – Information Security Management

NIST Cybersecurity Framework – Access Control & Authentication

Authorization controls ensure that users have appropriate access levels based on their roles and responsibilities. The primary concern arises when all users have uniform access, as it violates the principle of least privilege (PoLP) and increases the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.

(A) Users can only see certain screens in the system.

Incorrect. This is a good security practice, as it limits user access based on job roles, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive information.

(B) Users are making frequent password change requests.

Incorrect. Frequent password resets might indicate poor password management but are not directly related to authorization controls.

(C) Users input incorrect passwords and get denied system access.

Incorrect. This indicates authentication issues, not an authorization control concern. If users are denied access due to incorrect passwords, the system’s authentication mechanisms are working correctly.

(D) Users are all permitted uniform access to the system. ✅

Correct. Authorization should be role-based, meaning different users should have different levels of access depending on their responsibilities. Uniform access violates security best practices and increases the risk of fraud, data misuse, and compliance violations.

IIA GTAG "Identity and Access Management" emphasizes that authorization controls should be based on job functions to prevent unnecessary exposure to sensitive data.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management highlights the importance of access control policies to mitigate cybersecurity risks.

IIA GTAG – "Identity and Access Management"

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management

COBIT Framework – Access Control and Identity Management

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is D, as uniform access across all users is a major security concern in authorization control.

Definition of a Firewall:

A firewall is a network security device (hardware or software) that monitors and controls incoming and outgoing network traffic.

It is designed to filter or prevent specific information from moving between internal and external networks, ensuring unauthorized access is blocked.

How a Firewall Works:

It uses rules and policies to determine whether to allow or block traffic.

Firewalls can be configured to prevent malware, hacking attempts, and unauthorized data transfers.

There are different types, including packet-filtering firewalls, stateful inspection firewalls, and next-generation firewalls (NGFWs).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Authorization:

Authorization refers to user access control, ensuring users have the correct permissions, but it does not filter network traffic.

B. Architecture model:

An architecture model defines the structure of an IT system but does not actively prevent or filter data movement.

D. Virtual private network (VPN):

A VPN encrypts data and provides secure remote access but does not filter or block data movement between networks.

IIA’s Perspective on IT Security Controls:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance emphasizes strong cybersecurity controls, including firewalls, to protect sensitive data.

IIA GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) on Information Security recommends using firewalls as a primary defense mechanism.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ISO 27001 Security Standards identify firewalls as critical tools for network security and data protection.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance and IT Security

IIA GTAG – Information Security Risks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

A physical control is a security measure designed to protect assets, facilities, and personnel from physical threats such as fire, theft, or unauthorized access. Fire detection and suppression equipment (e.g., fire alarms, sprinklers, extinguishers) directly protects physical assets, making it a clear example of a physical control.

(A) Providing fire detection and suppression equipment. ✅

Correct. This is a direct physical security control that helps mitigate fire risks by detecting and suppressing fires.

IIA GTAG "Physical Security and IT Asset Protection" identifies fire detection as an essential physical security measure.

(B) Establishing a physical security policy and promoting it throughout the organization. ❌

Incorrect. A policy is an administrative control, not a physical control. While important, it does not provide direct physical protection.

(C) Performing business continuity and disaster recovery planning. ❌

Incorrect. This is a procedural control, not a physical one. Planning for disasters does not physically secure assets but instead prepares an organization for recovery.

(D) Keeping an offsite backup of the organization's critical data. ❌

Incorrect. This is an IT security control, ensuring data availability rather than physically protecting assets.

IIA GTAG – "Physical Security and IT Asset Protection"

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance (Risk Management Controls)

COBIT Framework – Physical and Environmental Security Controls

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is A, as fire detection and suppression equipment provides direct physical protection against fire-related risks.

The most effective way to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information is to limit access based on employee roles and duties. This follows the principle of least privilege (PoLP), ensuring that employees only access the data necessary for their job functions.

(A) Nondisclosure agreements between the firm and its employees. ❌

Incorrect. While NDAs help deter leaks, they do not prevent unauthorized access to information. An employee who signs an NDA can still access and leak data.

(B) Logs of user activity within the information system. ❌

Incorrect. Activity logs help detect and investigate breaches but do not actively prevent unauthorized disclosure.

(C) Two-factor authentication for access into the information system. ❌

Incorrect. While two-factor authentication enhances system security, it does not prevent employees with authorized access from leaking confidential data.

(D) Limited access to information, based on employee duties. ✅

Correct. Role-based access control (RBAC) ensures that employees only access the information necessary for their job responsibilities, reducing the risk of leaks.

IIA GTAG "Identity and Access Management" highlights restricted access as the most effective control for preventing unauthorized disclosure of confidential data.

IIA GTAG – "Identity and Access Management"

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Data Protection Controls)

COBIT Framework – Information Security and Access Control

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is D (Limited access to information, based on employee duties), as restricting access is the most effective preventive control against data disclosure.

Understanding the Three Lines of Defense Model:

First Line of Defense (Operational Management): Performs daily IT security tasks, such as blocking unauthorized traffic and encrypting data.

Second Line of Defense (Risk Management & Compliance): Monitors and reviews security controls, including disaster recovery testing and risk management activities.

Third Line of Defense (Internal Audit): Provides an independent assessment of IT security controls.

Why Option C (Review Disaster Recovery Test Results) Is Correct?

The second line of defense is responsible for monitoring and evaluating IT risk management processes, including disaster recovery and business continuity planning.

Reviewing disaster recovery test results ensures that the organization is prepared for IT disruptions and meets compliance requirements.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance requires auditors to evaluate whether IT risk management activities (such as disaster recovery) are being effectively monitored.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Block unauthorized traffic):

This is a first-line defense task, typically handled by IT security teams (e.g., firewall and intrusion detection system monitoring).

Option B (Encrypt data):

Encryption is part of daily IT security operations and is handled by the first line of defense.

Option D (Provide an independent assessment of IT security):

Independent assessments are the responsibility of internal audit (third line of defense), not the second line.

The second line of defense focuses on monitoring IT risk, making disaster recovery test review a key responsibility.

IIA Standard 2110 and the Three Lines of Defense Model confirm this role.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (IT Risk Management)

IIA Three Lines of Defense Model

COBIT Framework – IT Governance & Risk Management

Understanding Job Enrichment:

Job enrichment is a job design technique that increases motivation by adding meaningful responsibilities, autonomy, and recognition to a job.

It aligns with Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, which suggests that responsibility and recognition are key motivators.

How Job Enrichment Increases Employee Motivation:

Increases Autonomy: Employees are given more decision-making power, leading to a stronger sense of ownership.

Provides Recognition: Workers receive direct feedback and acknowledgment for their contributions.

Encourages Skill Development: Employees handle more complex tasks, improving job satisfaction and career growth opportunities.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Job complicating – Incorrect, as this is not a recognized job design technique; increasing job difficulty does not improve motivation.

B. Job rotation – Incorrect, as job rotation involves shifting employees between different tasks to reduce monotony, but it does not necessarily increase job responsibility or recognition.

D. Job enlargement – Incorrect, as job enlargement adds more tasks at the same skill level, increasing workload without necessarily improving responsibility or recognition.

IIA’s Perspective on Employee Motivation and Organizational Success:

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management states that internal auditors should evaluate employee engagement strategies, including job design techniques.

COSO ERM Framework emphasizes that motivated employees contribute to operational efficiency and organizational success.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management & Employee Motivation

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory – Motivation through Responsibility and Recognition

COSO ERM – Employee Engagement and Organizational Performance

Thus, the correct and verified answer is C. Job enrichment.

Definition of Predictive Analytics:

Predictive analytics uses historical data, machine learning, and statistical algorithms to forecast future outcomes.

In the healthcare sector, it is used to predict patient readmission rates and identify those at high risk of needing additional treatment.

How Predictive Analytics Applies to Hospitals:

Hospitals analyze patient histories, symptoms, treatments, and recovery rates to determine the likelihood of readmission.

Predictive models help healthcare providers take proactive measures, such as tailored post-discharge care plans, to reduce readmission risks.

This leads to better patient outcomes and cost savings.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Prescriptive analytics:

Prescriptive analytics goes beyond prediction and provides recommendations for action. In this case, the hospital is only determining which patients are likely to require additional treatment, not recommending treatments.

C. Descriptive analytics:

Descriptive analytics focuses on summarizing past data without making predictions. It would be used to report on past patient admissions but not to predict future readmissions.

D. Diagnostic analytics:

Diagnostic analytics analyzes the causes of past events but does not forecast future patient readmissions.

IIA’s Perspective on Data Analytics in Decision-Making:

IIA GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) on Data Analytics emphasizes the role of predictive analytics in risk assessment and operational efficiency.

COSO ERM Framework supports predictive modeling as part of strategic risk management.

IIA References:

IIA GTAG – Data Analytics in Risk Management

COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework

NIST Big Data Framework for Predictive Analytics

In a vertically centralized organization, decision-making authority is concentrated at the top levels of management. As a company rapidly expands, maintaining tight control by a small management team can lead to inefficiencies, delays, and suboptimal decision-making due to limited input from operational and frontline staff.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Lack of coordination among different business units

Incorrect. While coordination challenges can exist in a large, decentralized organization, a tightly controlled, centralized structure typically ensures strong coordination but at the cost of slower decision-making.

Option B: Operational decisions are inconsistent with organizational goals

Incorrect. In a centralized structure, top management closely controls decision-making, making goal misalignment less likely.

Option C: Suboptimal decision making

Correct.

Decentralized decision-making allows managers closer to operations to make informed, timely decisions.

A small centralized team may lack specialized knowledge about different departments, leading to inefficient or outdated decisions.

As the company expands, delays in decision-making and lack of responsiveness to market conditions increase risk exposure.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess organizational structures to identify risks associated with inefficient decision-making and control bottlenecks. (IIA Standard 2110: Governance)

Option D: Duplication of business activities

Incorrect. Duplication of activities is more common in decentralized structures, where different departments operate independently. A tightly controlled, centralized structure reduces redundancy but at the cost of decision-making efficiency.

Thus, the verified answer is C. Suboptimal decision making.

Role of a Witness in Contract Signing:

A witness is a neutral third party who observes the signing of a contract and confirms that the named individuals actually signed the document.

This helps prevent disputes regarding the authenticity of signatures and provides legal proof of agreement.

Why Signature Validation is the Primary Role:

Ensures legitimacy: A witness confirms that the signatures belong to the stated individuals, preventing forgery.

Legal enforceability: Many jurisdictions require witnesses for contracts to be legally binding in certain cases (e.g., wills, real estate agreements).

Provides evidence in case of disputes: If a signatory later denies signing, the witness can testify to the authenticity of the signature.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. A witness verifies the quantities of the copies signed – Incorrect.

A witness does not count copies; their role is to verify authentic signatures.

B. A witness verifies that the contract was signed with the free consent of the promisor and promisee – Incorrect.

While witnessing may imply that parties were present, it does not guarantee free consent (coercion concerns require separate legal evidence).

C. A witness ensures the completeness of the contract between the promisor and promisee – Incorrect.

Contract completeness is a legal or managerial responsibility, not a witness’s role.

IIA’s Perspective on Contract Verification and Internal Controls:

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management requires internal auditors to ensure proper contract validation and documentation.

COSO Internal Control Framework highlights the importance of contract controls, including witnessed signings for fraud prevention.

International Contract Law Principles emphasize the role of witnesses in reducing contract disputes.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management in Contract Management

COSO Internal Control Framework – Legal Documentation and Witnessing

International Contract Law Principles – Witnessing Signatures for Legal Validity

Thus, the correct and verified answer is D. A witness validates that the signatures on the contract were signed by the promisor and promisee.

Absorption costing is a costing method that allocates all manufacturing costs (both variable and fixed) to the cost of a product. In this method, fixed manufacturing overhead costs are treated as indirect product costs because they are not directly traceable to a single unit of production but are still part of the total cost of producing goods.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Direct, product costs.

Incorrect. Direct costs are costs that can be traced directly to a specific product, such as direct materials and direct labor. Fixed manufacturing overhead is not a direct cost because it is spread across all units produced.

Option B: Indirect product costs.

Correct. Fixed manufacturing overhead costs (such as rent, depreciation, and utilities for the production facility) are indirect costs because they support the entire production process rather than a specific product. However, under absorption costing, they are still treated as product costs and allocated to inventory.

IIA Reference: The IIA’s guidance on cost allocation states that absorption costing assigns all manufacturing costs (including fixed overhead) to products. (IIA Practice Guide: Cost and Profitability Analysis)

Option C: Direct period costs.

Incorrect. Period costs are expensed in the period they occur, while absorption costing treats fixed manufacturing overhead as part of inventory (product cost) until sold.

Option D: Indirect period costs.

Incorrect. Fixed manufacturing overhead is not expensed immediately as a period cost under absorption costing; it is capitalized into inventory and expensed as Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) when the product is sold.

Thus, the verified answer is B. Indirect product costs.

Understanding Matrix Organizations:

A matrix organization is a hybrid structure that combines functional and project-based structures, where employees report to multiple managers (e.g., a functional manager and a project manager).

These organizations adapt to projects by adjusting authority, responsibility, and accountability based on the project's stage or the organization's culture.

Why Option C Is Correct?

In a matrix organization, roles and decision-making authority evolve based on the project's phase, size, or complexity.

Employees might report to different managers at different times, and accountability structures may change.

This aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which emphasizes clear roles and responsibilities in dynamic organizational structures.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Unity-of-command concept):

The unity-of-command principle states that employees should report to only one superior, which contradicts the nature of a matrix organization, where dual reporting exists.

Option B (Combination of product and functional departments allows management to utilize personnel from various functions):

While matrix organizations integrate product and functional departments, the key defining feature is the variable authority, responsibility, and accountability, making option C a better fit.

Option D (Best suited for firms with scattered locations or large-scale firms):

While matrix structures can be used in large firms, they are not limited to them and are often found in project-based industries (e.g., engineering, IT, consulting).

Matrix organizations adapt their authority structures based on project needs, making option C the best choice.

IIA Standard 2110 supports governance structures that evolve with organizational needs.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Organizational Structure & Accountability)

COSO ERM – Governance & Decision-Making in Matrix Organizations