Free Appian ACD200 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

The question is about the potential causes of a low completion rate of 10% for a process model. The following are two possible causes of this:

• The process instances are long-lived compared to the configured days until archival or deletion. This means that the process instances take a long time to complete, and they are archived or deleted before they reach the end event. This reduces the completion rate, as only the instances that reach the end event are counted as completed.
• A large number of instances are encountering process errors, and they are not being addressed by the production support team. This means that the process instances are stuck in an error state, and they cannot proceed to the next step or the end event. This reduces the completion rate, as only the instances that reach the end event are counted as completed.

The following are not likely causes of a low completion rate:

• A large value is configured for days until archival or deletion compared to other process models in your application. This means that the process instances have more time to complete before they are archived or deleted. This should increase the completion rate, as more instances can reach the end event before they are removed from the system.
• A large number of smart service nodes are configured in the process model. This means that the process model has a complex logic or functionality that requires multiple smart services. This does not directly affect the completion rate, as long as the smart services execute successfully and do not cause errors or delays.

References:

• Process Model Metrics
• Archiving and Deleting Process Instances

 The best way to restrict the uploading of documents without extensions at the environment level is to enable the File Upload > Block files without an extension option under the Administration Console. This option will prevent users from uploading files that do not have a valid file extension, such as .docx, .pdf, or .png. This can help to avoid security risks and compatibility issues with unsupported file types. Therefore, the correct answer is A.

References:

• [File Upload Settings]
• [File Extensions]

 Activity chaining is a feature that allows users to complete multiple tasks in a row without returning to their task list. However, activity chaining can also have some drawbacks, such as increased memory consumption, longer transaction times, and reduced user feedback. Therefore, some practices are strongly discouraged for activity chaining, such as having more than 50 node instances or more than 5 seconds between attended activities. These practices can cause performance issues, user frustration, or process failures. Therefore, the correct answers are B and C.

References:

• Activity Chaining
• Performance Best Practices

An integration that modifies data can be called from three locations: web API (POST, PUT, DELETE), process model, and SAIL saveInto parameter. These locations allow for sending data to an external system or service and receiving a response.

• Web API (POST, PUT, DELETE) are HTTP methods that are typically used to create, update, or delete data on a server. An integration that modifies data can be exposed as a web API with one of these methods, allowing external applications or systems to invoke it through an HTTP request1.
• Process model is a graphical representation of a business workflow that consists of nodes and flows. An integration that modifies data can be called from a process model using either an integration node or a Call Integration smart service2. This allows for orchestrating complex workflows that involve data manipulation across different systems or sources.
• SAIL saveInto parameter is a property of a SAIL component that specifies an expression to be evaluated when the component is modified by the user3. An integration that modifies data can be called from an interface using the saveInto parameter of a SAIL component. This allows for triggering data changes based on user actions or events on the interface.

The @Version annotation is used to avoid the collision of data from an application when more than one user is editing the same record in a database. The @Version annotation enables optimistic locking, which is a mechanism to detect and prevent concurrent updates on the same record. Optimistic locking assumes that multiple transactions can complete without affecting each other, and that therefore transactions do not need to lock data resources until they are ready to commit. However, if a transaction tries to commit changes to a record that has been modified by another transaction since it was last read, an OptimisticLockException is thrown and the transaction is rolled back. The @Version annotation can be applied to a field or property of a CDT that stores a numeric value. This value is used as a version number that is automatically incremented by Appian every time the record is updated. References: Does Appian support @Version JPA Annotation?, JPA - Optimistic Locking and Use of @Version annotation

 According to Appian best practices, the preferred style and size for the images to display the profile picture of each employee inside an employee grid are style: “AVATAR” and size: “SMALL”. This is because the avatar style creates a circular image that is suitable for profile pictures, and the small size creates a 32x32 pixel image that fits well inside a grid cell. The standard style creates a rectangular image that may not look good for profile pictures, and the large size creates a 128x128 pixel image that may be too big for a grid cell. References: Image Component

 The question is about the default limit for maximum number of node executions in a repeating step in a process. The default limit is 1000, as it is the value of the system property conf.bpm.maxNodeExecutionsPerInstance, which controls how many times a node can be executed in a single process instance. This limit is intended to prevent infinite loops or excessive node executions that could affect the performance or stability of Appian. The other options are not correct, as they are either too high or too low. References:

• Repeating Steps in Processes
• System Properties Reference

 The requirement is to use space efficiently in a user interface where the meaningful order of components is vertical. A columns layout is the most appropriate layout component for this requirement, as it allows you to arrange components into columns that stack vertically on smaller devices. A columns layout also provides options to control the width, alignment, and visibility of each column. The other options are not suitable for this requirement, as they either do not preserve the vertical order of components or do not use space efficiently. References:

• Columns Layout