Free ACFE CFE-Financial-Transactions-and-Fraud-Schemes Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer: One of the strongest internal controls against fraudulent billing schemes (such as shell companies, inflated invoices, and kickbacks) is to require competitive bidding. This ensures transparency, reduces favoritism, and makes it harder for employees and vendors to collude.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A – Fraud tips are valuable, but routing them only through supervisors may suppress reporting; hotlines are more effective.

B – Combining purchasing and payment increases fraud risk by reducing segregation of duties.

D – Outsourcing negotiations does not directly prevent billing fraud.

Key Concept: Internal controls and segregation of duties in preventing billing schemes.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:This is True. When an employee has significant authority or discretion in the procurement process (e.g., drafting specifications, approving vendors, or evaluating bids), they are more capable of steering contracts toward favored suppliers. This increases the risk of corruption schemes like kickbacks or bid-rigging.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

B. False – Incorrect; influence grows with authority over procurement.

Key Concept:Procurement authority is a key risk factor for corruption.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Fraudsters may use false packing slips to misdirect deliveries of inventory. By altering or falsifying packing documentation, employees can ensure goods are sent to themselves or accomplices instead of legitimate recipients.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. False shipping slip – Related but less accurate; shipping documents are broader.

C. Fraudulent inventory slip – Not a standard fraud term.

D. False credit slip – Relates to receivables manipulation, not inventory deliveries.

Key Concept:False packing slip schemes in inventory misappropriation.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Loan fraud often involves suspicious or unusual documentation patterns. A change order submitted at the same time as a draw request is a red flag, because it suggests manipulation of project costs to justify larger draws from lenders.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Missing documents – Could indicate sloppy recordkeeping, not necessarily fraud.

B. Low turnover – Not a fraud indicator.

D. Increasing change orders – Could be suspicious, but not as strong a fraud red flag as simultaneous change order and draw request.

Key Concept: Loan fraud indicators.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Insider cyberfraud thrives in environments where monitoring is weak. If access logs are not reviewed, malicious activity can go undetected, enabling fraud.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

B. Programs run during business day – Normal IT operations, not a fraud risk.

C. Restricted access – This is a preventive control, not a facilitator.

D. Separation of duties – Strong control, prevents insider fraud.

Key Concept: Conditions facilitating insider cyberfraud.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:This statement is True. Fraud examiners often analyze purchases by vendor to detect schemes where a single vendor receives disproportionately favorable treatment. This may indicate kickbacks, conflicts of interest, or vendor collusion schemes.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

B. False – Incorrect, as vendor analysis is a valid tool to identify such schemes.

Key Concept:Purchases by vendor analysis as a fraud detection method.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:This is True. The net result of revenues and expenses (credits and debits) on the income statement flows into retained earnings, which is part of equity on the balance sheet. Therefore, excess credits (profits) increase equity, while excess debits (losses) decrease equity.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

B. False – Incorrect, as the closing process of the accounting cycle directly affects equity.

Key Concept:Closing process and impact of net income on equity.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Conflict of interest is often uncovered through proactive investigative methods such as tips, vendor ownership review, and employee interviews. Underbilling schemes, however, relate to Financial Statement Fraud and Revenue Recognition Manipulation, not conflict of interest detection.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Tips & Complaints – Common detection method; many corruption schemes are revealed this way.

B. Review of vendor ownership files – Critical to identify hidden ownership ties.

D. Interviews with purchasing personnel – Helps detect suspicious relationships or favoritism.

Key Concept: Detection of Conflict of Interest schemes.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:This scheme is known as a Turnaround Sale or Flip. The employee secretly purchases an asset their employer needs and then resells it to the employer at a markup, thereby profiting at the employer’s expense.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Conflict of interest in sale – Too general; does not describe the flipping mechanism.

C. Unauthorized sale – Not an ACFE fraud category in this context.

D. Written sale of unique assets – Not a recognized scheme.

Key Concept: Conflict of Interest scheme — Turnaround Sales/Flips.

Detailed Explanation:

Rationale for Correct Answer:Bid tailoring occurs when procurement officials structure contract requirements to unfairly favor a particular vendor. A hallmark red flag is unusually narrow specifications, which restrict competition.

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

A. Clear submission information – Standard and appropriate, not a red flag.

C. Rebid contracts – Could indicate limited interest, but not tailoring.

D. Numerous bidders – Indicates competition, opposite of bid tailoring.

Key Concept: Procurement fraud — bid tailoring.