Free PMI PMI-RMP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 3

Stakeholder engagement is critical in risk management, especially when decisions may impact project deliverables. By involving stakeholders more in risk management activities and decision-making processes, the risk manager could have ensured that all parties were aware of potential changes and their implications. This engagement helps in securing stakeholder buy-inand support, thus preventing situations where stakeholders might oppose decisions after the fact. PMI’s risk management framework emphasizes the importance of continuous and active stakeholder engagement throughout the project lifecycle​.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide1, risk identification is the process of determining which risks may affect the project and documenting their characteristics. It involves the use of various techniques to gather information from different sources and perspectives, such as stakeholders, experts, historical data, assumptions, and environmental factors. Some of the common techniques for risk identification are meetings, facilitated workshops, interviews, brainstorming, checklists, questionnaires, SWOT analysis, and root cause analysis. These techniques help to elicit the knowledge and opinions of the participants, and to generate a comprehensive list of potential risks that can be further analyzed and prioritized. In this case, the risk management expert should recommend the agency to conduct meetings, facilitated workshops, and interviews with stakeholders to identify potential risks and develop the handbook. This will help to understand the context and objectives of the agency, the expectations and concerns of the farmers and landlords, the challenges and opportunities in the agriculture sector, and the possible sources and impacts of uncertainty. The risk management expert can then use the information gathered from these techniques to create a risk register and a risk management plan, which can form the basis of the handbook. This is part of the Identify Risks process in the PMBOK® Guide1. References: 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition

Engaging stakeholders through meetings, workshops, and interviews is crucial for risk identification, as it allows the agency to gather diverse perspectives and insights on potential risks. This approach is more effective than relying solely on standard tools or hiring an expert.

When a risk manager needs to prioritize resources to respond to multiple identified risks, qualitative analysis is the most appropriate tool. Qualitative analysis helps in evaluating the likelihood and impact of each risk using subjective criteria, allowing the risk manager to prioritize which risks require more immediate attention or resources based on their potential impact on the project.

PMI's guidelines on risk management suggest that qualitative analysis is particularly useful in the initial stages of risk assessment, where risks are categorized and ranked based on their severity. This process helps in prioritizing risks that need immediate attention, thus optimizing the use of resources in a project​​.

The risk manager should recommend that the project manager review the plans for the key activity, as this will help identify potential issues and opportunities to improve the activity's performance and reduce its impact on the critical path.

The risk manager should recommend the project manager to review the plans for the key activity, which is now on the critical path according to the Monte Carlo simulation. The critical path is the sequence of activities that determines the minimum possible duration of the project. Any delay on the critical path will affect the project completion date. Therefore, it is important to review the plans for the key activity and identify any potential risks, issues, or opportunities that may affect its performance. The risk manager and the project manager should also evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of any risk response strategies for the key activity, such as fast-tracking, crashing, or resource optimization. The other options are not appropriate recommendations for the risk manager to make. Adding more float to the key activity is not possible, since the critical path has zero float by definition. Adding more contingency to the project may not address the specific risks or issues related to the key activity. Increasing the budget for the key activitymay not improve its duration or quality, and may also increase the project cost baseline unnecessarily. References: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Examination Content Outline and Specifications, page 91. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, pages 215-2162. Project Critical Path Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation3.

 The project manager should proceed with the planned risk response to move the equipment, as this is the best way to deal with the weather-related risk that was identified and recorded in the risk register. A risk register is a document that lists all the identified risks, their causes, impacts, probabilities, and responses for a project1. A risk response is a strategy or action that is taken to reduce the negative effects or enhance the positive effects of a risk event2. A riskresponse should be planned and executedaccording to the risk management plan, which is a document that describes how risk management activities will be structured and performed on a project3. The risk management plan should also define the roles and responsibilities, risk categories, risk appetite and thresholds, risk identification and analysis methods, risk response strategies, risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms, and risk governance mechanisms3. Therefore, the project manager should follow the risk management plan and the risk register to implement the planned risk response to move the equipment, as this is the most effective and efficient way to manage the risk and meet the project objectives. Waiting until the weather improves before sending the equipment, asking the project sponsor to approve shipping the equipment, or requesting the shipment of the equipment to satisfy the client are not the best options to deal with the weather-related risk. Waiting until the weather improves may cause further delays and increase the cost and scope of the project, as well as damage the relationship with the client. Asking the project sponsor to approve shipping the equipment may not be necessary or feasible, as the project sponsor may not have the authority or the availability to make such a decision. Requesting the shipment of the equipment to satisfy the client may not be realistic or safe, as the bad weather may pose a threat to the quality and integrity of the equipment, as well as the health and safety of the people involved in the transportation. These options may also deviate from the risk management plan and the risk register, which may create confusion and inconsistencyin the risk management process. References: 1, 2, 3.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the risk response plan is the set of actions that the project team will take to address the identified risks. The risk response plan should be reviewed and updated periodically throughout the project lifecycle, as new risks may emerge or existing risks may change. The risk owners are the persons assigned the responsibility of monitoring the risks and implementing the risk response actions. The risk owners should work with the risk manager and other stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness of the risk response plan and make any necessary adjustments. In this case, the risk manager should ask the risk owners to review the risk response plan and see if there are any alternative or additional actions that can be taken to deal with the delay caused by the external team. Starting a quantitative analysis, crashing the schedule, or transferring the risk are not appropriate actions for this situation, asthey are either too late, too costly, or too risky. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 452-453; The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects, page 79.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

When there is confusion among stakeholders regarding agile concepts, thebest course of action is to provide trainingto ensure all stakeholders have a common understanding of agile principles and terminology.

Option A: Organize training sessions to create awareness around the agile values for stakeholders (Correct Answer).

Training sessions help bridge knowledge gaps by ensuring that stakeholdersunderstand agile principles, frameworks (Scrum, Kanban, XP), and terminology.

The PMI-RMP Guide highlights thateffective stakeholder engagement requires education and alignmenton risk management strategies, which applies here as well (PMI Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects – A Practice Guide, 2022, p. 78).

Educating stakeholdersreduces resistanceto change and promotesinformed decision-making.

PMI’sAgile Practice Guideemphasizes that “a shared understanding of agile principles across all levels of an organization increases agility and reduces friction during decision-making” (PMI & Agile Alliance, 2017, p. 44).

Option B: Facilitate a face-to-face discussion and have stakeholders agree to shift to agile for future projects (Incorrect).

Forcing a decisionbefore stakeholders fully understand agile methodologiescould lead to resistance and ineffective implementation.

The decision should bebased on business needsrather than prematurely committing to agile.

Option C: Recommend an external facilitator as no one in the organization is able to eliminate this roadblock (Incorrect).

While an external facilitatorcan helpin some situations, the Scrum Masteris already responsible for coaching the organization on Scrum and Agile methodologies(Scrum Guide, 2020).

The Scrum Mastershould take the leadin educating stakeholders before escalating the issue externally.

Option D: Allow stakeholders to discuss without the Scrum Master’s intervention (Incorrect).

Without proper guidance, discussions could lead to furthermisinterpretations and delays.

The Scrum Masteris responsible for educating and guiding stakeholdersin understanding agile (Scrum Guide, 2020).

Final Verdict:The correct answer isA (Organize training sessions to create awareness around agile values for stakeholders)because trainingensures a common understanding, reduces resistance, and promotes effective decision-making.

References:

PMI.Agile Practice Guide(2017). PMI & Agile Alliance.

PMI.Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects – A Practice Guide(2022).

Scrum.org.The Scrum Guide(2020).

To determine whether to purchase the new component, we can perform an Expected Monetary Value (EMV) analysis for both scenarios: purchasing the component and not purchasing it.

1. Purchasing the New Component:

Probability of Success: 70% (0.7)

Profit if Successful: US$500,000

EMV of Success: 0.7 * $500,000 = $350,000

Probability of Failure: 30% (0.3)

Additional Cost if Failed: US$50,000

EMV of Failure: 0.3 * (-$50,000) = -$15,000

Cost of Component: -$100,000

Total EMV: $350,000 (success) - $15,000 (failure) - $100,000 (cost) = $235,000

2. Not Purchasing the New Component:

Probability of Failure: 80% (0.8)

Cost if Failed: US$250,000

EMV of Failure: 0.8 * (-$250,000) = -$200,000

Probability of Success: 20% (0.2)

Profit if Successful: US$0 (assuming no additional profit without the component)

EMV of Success: 0.2 * $0 = $0

Total EMV: $0 (success) - $200,000 (failure) = -$200,000

Comparing the two scenarios, purchasing the new component yields a positive EMV of $235,000, whereas not purchasing it results in a negative EMV of -$200,000. Therefore, from a risk management perspective, it is advisable to purchase the new component.

PMI Risk Management Study Guide References:

The PMI-RMP Exam Preparation Study Guide discusses the application of Expected Monetary Value (EMV) analysis in decision-making under uncertainty, providing a structured approach to evaluate potential financial outcomes.

Residual risk refers to the remaining risk after implementing risk responses or controls. In this scenario, despite the policy requiring complex passwords and regular updates, some employees' inability to comply increases the likelihood of password compromise. This non-compliance elevates the residual risk beyond acceptable levels. The risk manager should reassess the residual risk to determine its current status and evaluate whether additional controls or actions are necessary to mitigate the heightened threat. This reassessment ensures that the organization's risk management strategies remain effective and aligned with its security objectives.

PMI Risk Management Study Guide References:

The PMI-RMP Exam Preparation Study Guide defines residual risk as "the risk that remains after risk responses have been implemented," highlighting the need for continuous monitoring and reassessment to address any changes in risk exposure.