Free PMI PMI-RMP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

The risk management plan is a document that describes how risk management activities will be structured and performed on a project. It defines the roles and responsibilities, risk categories, risk appetite and thresholds, risk identification and analysis methods, risk response strategies, risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms, and risk governance mechanisms1. The risk management plan should be aligned with the project management plan, which defines the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and other aspects2. When an organization decides to accelerate a key project, it means that the project objectives, assumptions, constraints, and environment have changed. This will affect the risk exposure and profile of the project, as well as the risk management approach and resources. Therefore, the first action for the project risk manager to take is to revise the risk management plan to reflect the new situation and ensure that the risk management process is still effective and efficient. Revising the risk management plan may involve updating the risk categories, risk appetite and thresholds, risk identification and analysis methods, risk response strategies, risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms, and risk governance mechanisms to suit the accelerated project. The project risk manager should also communicate the revised risk management plan to the relevant stakeholders and obtain their approval and support1. Ensuring sufficient resources are available, updating the risk register, and meeting with the project’s stakeholders are all important actions to take when accelerating a project, but they are not the first action. These actions should be done after revising the risk management plan, as they depend on the updated risk management approach and process. For example, the project risk manager may need to allocate more resources to risk management activities, identify and analyze new or changed risks, implement new or modified risk responses, and report the risk status and performance to the stakeholders based on the revised risk management plan1. References: 2, 1.

When a project is accelerated, the risk landscape changes. The project risk manager should first revise the risk management plan to address the new timeline and its potential impacts on the project. This will help in identifying new risks, reassessing existing risks, and updating risk responses.

When closing risks as part of the closing process, it is important to update the lessons learned document. This document captures the knowledge and experience gained during the project and can be valuable for future projects.

 Lessons learned is a document that captures the knowledge gained from the project and can help improve the performance of future projects. It is one of the outputs of the project closure process and should include information on the project risks, issues, and responses. Lessons learned can help identify the best practices and lessons to be applied or avoided in similar projects. Updating the lessons learned document is an important part of closing the risks as it can provide valuable insights for risk management. References: PMI, Project Risk Management, 2nd edition, 2019, p. 97-981

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 11: Project Risk Management1, the risk manager should request the risk management plan first from the project sponsor to identify major risks. This is because:

The risk management plan is a document that describes how risk management activities will be planned, structured, and performed throughout the project life cycle. The risk management plan provides guidance and direction for the risk manager and the project team on how to identify, analyze, prioritize, respond, and monitor risks, as well as how to allocate resources, define roles and responsibilities, establish risk categories, and document risk-related information.

The risk management plan is a key input for the risk identification process, which is the process of determining which risks may affect the project and documenting their characteristics. The risk identification process involves using various tools and techniques, such as brainstorming, interviews, checklists, assumptions and constraints analysis, SWOT analysis, expert judgment, and data gathering, to generate a comprehensive list of potential risks that may impact the project objectives, such as scope, schedule, cost, quality, or stakeholder satisfaction.

The risk management plan helps the risk manager to identify major risks by providing the following information:

The risk management strategy, which defines the approach and methodology for managing risks, including the level of detail, rigor, and frequency of the risk management activities, and the alignment with the project management plan and the organization’s policies and procedures.

The risk thresholds, which specify the acceptable level of risk exposure for the project and its objectives, based on the risk appetite, tolerance, and attitude of the project sponsor and other key stakeholders.

The risk categories, which are a group of potential causes of risk that can be used to structure and organize the identified risks into a hierarchical structure, such as a risk breakdown structure (RBS). The risk categories can be derived from various sources, such as the project scope statement, the work breakdown structure (WBS), the organizational process assets, or the industry standards and practices.

The roles and responsibilities, which define the authority and accountability of the project team members and other stakeholders involved in the risk management process, such as the risk manager, the risk owner, the risk committee, the risk auditor, and the risk reviewer.

The resources, which specify the budget, time, and human resources allocated for the risk management process, as well as the tools, techniques, and software applications that will be used to support the risk management activities.

The communication and reporting, which describe the type, format, content, frequency, and distribution of the risk-related information and reports that will be shared among the project team and other stakeholders, such as the risk register, the risk report, the risk dashboard, and the risk audit report.

The other options are not the best documents to request first from the project sponsor to identify major risks because:

The clients’ credit scores are a specific type of data that can be used to assess the credit risk of the loans, but they do not provide a comprehensive view of all the potential risks that may affect the project, such as technical, operational, legal, regulatory, or market risks.

The organization’s mission and vision are high-level statements that describe the purpose, values, and goals of the organization, but they do not provide specific guidance or direction on how to manage risks for the project, such as the risk management strategy, methodology, or tools.

The historical data from the credit portfolio are a source of information that can be used to analyze the past performance and trends of the loans, but they do not reflect the current or future uncertainties and opportunities that may impact the project, such as changes in customer behavior, technology, competition, or regulation.

The risk manager should first update the risk register with the new risk identified by the vendor. This will help in keeping track of all the risks associated with the project and facilitate the subsequent planning and management of the risks.

 The risk manager should update the new risk in the risk register, which is a project document that records the details of all identified risks, including their description, category, cause, probability, impact, and response strategy. Updating the risk register is the first step to acknowledge the existence of the new risk and to document its characteristics and potential effects on the project objectives. The risk register can then be used as an input for the Plan Risk Responses process, where the risk manager can develop appropriate actions to address the new risk. References: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Sixth Edition, 2017, p. 397, 441.

When facing resistance from team members, the risk manager should engage in open communication to address their concerns and clarify the importance of risk management in the project.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 11: Project Risk Management1, the risk manager should handle this situation by meeting with team members to address their concerns. This is because:

Resistance to risk management is a common challenge that can hinder the effectiveness and efficiency of the risk management process. Resistance can stem from various factors, such as lack of awareness, understanding, commitment, trust, or support for risk management; fear of negative consequences or blame; competing priorities or interests; or cultural differences or biases.

Meeting with team members to address their concerns is a proactive and constructive way to overcome resistance and foster a positive risk culture within the project. By meeting with team members, the risk manager can:

Communicate the value and benefits of risk management for the project and the organization, such as improving decision-making, enhancing performance, increasing stakeholder satisfaction, and reducing uncertainty and variability.

Educate and train team members on the risk management principles, processes, tools, and techniques, and how they can be applied to the project context and objectives.

Involve and empower team members in the risk management activities, such as identifying, analyzing, prioritizing, responding, and monitoring risks, and solicit their feedback and suggestions for improvement.

Recognize and reward team members for their contributions and achievements in risk management, and celebrate the successful outcomes and opportunities realized by the project.

The other options are not effective in handling this situation because:

Continuing to implement the risk strategy without addressing the resistance can lead to further conflict, resentment, and distrust among the team members, and undermine the quality and credibility of the risk management process and outputs.

Reducing the number of risk management activities can compromise the project’s ability to identify and respond to the risks that may affect its scope, schedule, cost, quality, or other objectives, and expose the project to unnecessary threats or missed opportunities.

Raising the concerns with the project sponsor can escalate the issue and create a negative impression of the team members, and may not resolve the underlying causes of the resistance or improve the team’s engagement and commitment to risk management.

Adding the identified risk to the risk register is the best action that the risk manager can take to address this risk. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their characteristics, their status, and their responses. By adding the risk to the risk register, the risk manager can ensure that the risk is not overlooked or ignored, and that it will be subjected to further probability and impact analysis to determine its priority and response strategy. Accepting the identified risk because other stakeholders feel that there are higher priority risks to address is not a good practice, as it may lead to overlooking a potentially significant risk that could affect the stakeholder’s team. Mitigating the identified risk in order to reduce the probability of impacting the stakeholder’s team is not advisable, as it may be a premature or unnecessary action without proper analysis of the risk probability and impact. Escalating the identified risk to the project sponsor and allowing them to determine the best course of action is not appropriate, as it may be an overreaction or a sign of lack of competence from the risk manager, who should be able to handle the risk identification and analysis process. References: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Exam Content Outline1, PMI Practice Standard for Project Risk Management2, Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Cert Guide3

According to the PMBOK Guide, the risk owner is the person assigned the responsibility of monitoring the risk and implementing the risk response plan. The risk owner should be involved in the risk response execution and evaluation, and should communicate the results and outcomes to the relevant stakeholders. In the case of a data breach, the risk owner should coordinate a response with the risk manager and other parties involved, such as the security team, the legal team, the customer service team, and the senior management. The risk owner should also report the status of the risk and the effectiveness of the response plan to the risk manager. The risk manager should oversee the risk response process and ensure that the risk is handled appropriately and in alignment with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 452-453; The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects, page 79.

The action that the risk manager should propose is to ask the team to prepare a Monte Carlo analysis. This is a statistical technique that can be used to model the probability of different outcomes in a project. By performing a Monte Carlo analysis, the project manager can objectively evaluate key project risks and develop response plans based on this analysis.

 A Monte Carlo analysis is a simul-ation technique that uses probability distributions and random sampling to model the possible outcomes of a project risk event. It can help the project manager to evaluate the key project risks and develop response plans based on the expected value, standard deviation, and confidence intervals of the results. A Monte Carlo analysis can also provide information on the probability of achieving the project objectives, such as cost, schedule, and quality. A Monte Carlo analysis is an objective method because it does not rely on subjective judgments or opinions, but on mathematical calculations and statistical data. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Section 11.5.2.3, Monte Carlo Analysis1

Meeting with the traffic authority staff responsible for the new regulation allows the project manager and risk manager to understand the potential changes and their impact on the project. This will help them proactively address any potential issues and ensure the project complies with the new regulations.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 11: Project Risk Management1, the project manager and the risk manager should handle this situation by meeting with the traffic authority staff in charge of the new regulation. This is because:

The new traffic regulation is an external risk that could affect the project objectives, such as scope, schedule, cost, quality, and customer satisfaction. External risks are those that arise from outside the project boundaries and are beyond the control of the project team. Examples of external risks include changes in government policies, regulations, laws, market conditions, environmental factors, etc.

The project manager and the risk manager should proactively engage with the external stakeholders who have the power and influence to create or modify the external risks. By meeting with the traffic authority staff, they can establish a positive relationship, gain insights into the new regulation, and influence its development to align with the project needs. They can also obtain information on the probability and impact of the risk, as well as the potential response strategies.

The other options are not effective in handling this situation because:

Ensuring the project complies with the current traffic regulations and laws does not address the risk of the new regulation that could change the project requirements, scope, or deliverables. It also does not help the project team to prepare for the possible changes and mitigate their negative effects.

Sending a letter to the traffic authority with the general project information does not establish a direct and timely communication channel with the external stakeholder. It also does not provide enough details or feedback to understand the nature and implications of the new regulation.

Performing inquiries on the website of the traffic authority weekly does not allow the project team to influence the development of the new regulation or obtain reliable and updated information. It also does not enable the project team to build trust and rapport with the external stakeholder.