Free Isaca CISM Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Laws and regulations provide the most useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because they define the legal and compliance requirements and obligations that the organization must adhere to, and guide the development and implementation of the security policies and controls that support them. Security budget is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security needs or goals, but rather a resource to enable the security activities and initiatives. Risk register is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security vision or mission, but rather a tool to identify and manage the security risks. Risk score is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security priorities or objectives, but rather a measure of the level of risk exposure or performance. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

= A post-incident review is a process of analyzing and learning from a security incident, such as a data breach, to improve the security posture and resilience of an organization. A post-incident review should include the following elements12:

A clear and accurate description of the incident, including its scope, impact, timeline, root cause, and contributing factors.

A detailed assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process, including the roles and responsibilities, communication channels, coordination mechanisms, escalation procedures, tools and resources, documentation, and reporting.

An evaluation of the adequacy of existing controls, such as policies, standards, procedures, technical measures, awareness, and training, to prevent, detect, and mitigate similar incidents in the future.

A list of actionable recommendations and improvement plans, based on the lessons learned and best practices, to address the identified gaps and weaknesses in the security strategy, governance, risk management, and incident management.

A follow-up and monitoring mechanism to ensure the implementation and verification of the recommendations and improvement plans.

The most important element to include in a post-incident review following a data breach is the evaluation of the adequacy of existing controls, because it directly relates to the security objectives and requirements of the organization, and provides the basis for enhancing the security posture and resilience of the organization. Evaluating the existing controls helps to identify the vulnerabilities and risks that led to the data breach, and to determine the appropriate corrective and preventive actions to reduce the likelihood and impact of similar incidents in the future. Evaluating the existing controls also helps to align the security strategy and governance with the business goals and objectives, and to ensure the compliance with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations.

The other elements, such as an evaluation of the effectiveness of the information security strategy, documentation of regulatory reporting requirements, and a review of the forensics chain of custody, are also important, but not as important as the evaluation of the existing controls. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the information security strategy is a broader and more strategic activity that may not be directly relevant to the specific incident, and may require more time and resources to conduct. Documentation of regulatory reporting requirements is a necessary and mandatory task, but it does not provide much insight or value for improving the security posture and resilience of the organization. A review of the forensics chain of custody is a technical and procedural activity that ensures the integrity and admissibility of the digital evidence collected during the incident investigation, but it does not address the root cause or the mitigation of the incident. References = 1: CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA 2: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 147

Senior leadership needs to understand how Zero Trust supports risk reduction and business needs. Communicating the impact on risk reduction and user experience aligns security initiatives with business goals.

“Communicating how security initiatives support business objectives and risk reduction is critical for gaining senior management support.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Business Alignment*

The first step is to invoke the incident response plan to ensure a systematic, controlled, and compliant response to the security incident.

“The incident response plan should be activated immediately to investigate, contain, and resolve incidents of unauthorized access.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan Execution*

ISACA practice questions also reinforce that invoking the incident response plan is the essential first response to contain the breach.

Labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely. Security classification is a process of categoriz-ing information based on its level of sensitivity and importance, and applying appropri-ate security controls based on the level of risk associated with that infor-mation1. Labeling is a process of marking the information with the appropriate classifi-cation level, such as public, internal, confidential, secret, or top secret2. The purpose of labeling is to inform the users of the information about its value and protection re-quirements, and to guide them on how to handle it securely. Labeling can help users to:

•Identify the information they are dealing with and its classification level

•Understand their roles and responsibilities regarding the information

•Follow the security policies and procedures for the information

•Avoid unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or destruction of the information

•Report any security incidents or breaches involving the information

Labeling can also help organizations to:

•Track and monitor the information and its usage

•Enforce access controls and encryption for the information

•Audit and review the compliance with security standards and regulations for the infor-mation

•Educate and train employees and stakeholders on information security awareness and best practices

Therefore, labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely, as it increases their awareness and accountability, and supports the implementation of security measures. The other op-tions are not the primary benefits of labeling information according to its security clas-sification. Reducing the number and type of countermeasures required is not a benefit, but rather a consequence of applying security controls based on the classification lev-el. Reducing the need to identify baseline controls for each classification is not a bene-fit, but rather a prerequisite for labeling information according to its security classifica-tion. Affecting the consequences if information is handled insecurely is not a benefit, but rather a risk that needs to be managed by implementing appropriate security con-trols and incident response procedures. References: 1: Information Classification - Ad-visera 2: Information Classification in Information Security - GeeksforGeeks : Infor-mation Security Policy - NIST : Information Security Classification Framework - Queensland Government

= The most important reason to ensure information security is aligned with the organization’s strategy is to optimize security risk management. Information security is not an isolated function, but rather an integral part of the organization’s overall objectives, processes, and governance. By aligning information security with the organization’s strategy, the information security manager can ensure that security risks are identified, assessed, treated, and monitored in a consistent, effective, and efficient manner1. Alignment also enables the information security manager to communicate the value and benefits of information security to senior management and other stakeholders, and to justify the allocation of resources and investments for security initiatives2. Alignment also helps to establish clear roles and responsibilities for information security across the organization, and to foster a culture of security awareness and accountability3. Therefore, alignment is essential for optimizing security risk management, which is the process of balancing the protection of information assets with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization4. References = 1: CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA 2: CISM_Review_Manual Pages 1-30 - Flip PDF Download | FlipHTML5 3: CISM 2020: Information Security & Business Process Alignment 4: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.1

The first step in developing an information security strategy is to identify key stakeholders who can provide support, guidance and resources for information security initiatives. These stakeholders may include senior management, business unit leaders, legal counsel, audit and compliance officers and other relevant parties. By engaging these stakeholders early on, an information security manager can ensure that the strategy aligns with business objectives and expectations, as well as gain buy-in and commitment from them. Determining acceptable levels of risk, creating a roadmap and performing a gap analysis are all important steps in developing an information security strategy, but they should follow after identifying key stakeholders.

Eradication is the phase of incident response where the incident team removes the threat from the affected systems and restores them to a secure state. If this phase is not successful, the malware may persist or reappear on the systems, causing further damage or compromise. Therefore, eradication is the correct answer.

= The most useful source of information for a newly hired information security manager who has been tasked with developing and implementing an information security strategy is the organization’s mission statement and roadmap. The mission statement defines the organization’s purpose, vision, values, and goals, and the roadmap outlines the organization’s strategic direction, priorities, and initiatives. By reviewing the mission statement and roadmap, the information security manager can understand the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security needs, and align the information security strategy with them. The information security strategy should support and enable the organization’s mission and roadmap, and provide the security governance, policies, standards, and controls to protect the organization’s information assets and processes.

The capabilities and expertise of the information security team (A) are important factors for the information security manager to consider, but they are not the most useful source of information for developing and implementing an information security strategy. The information security team is responsible for executing and maintaining the information security program and activities, such as risk management, security awareness, incident response, and compliance. The information security manager should assess the capabilities and expertise of the information security team to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, and to plan the resource allocation, training, and development of the team. However, the capabilities and expertise of the information security team do not directly inform the information security strategy, which should be driven by the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security needs.

A prior successful information security strategy © is a possible source of information for the information security manager to refer to, but it is not the most useful one. A prior successful information security strategy is a strategy that has been implemented and evaluated by another organization or a previous information security manager, and has achieved the desired security outcomes and benefits. The information security manager can learn from the best practices, lessons learned, and challenges of a prior successful information security strategy, and apply them to the current organization or situation. However, a prior successful information security strategy may not be relevant, applicable, or suitable for the organization, as it may not reflect the current or future business objectives, risk appetite, and security needs of the organization, or the changing threat landscape and business environment.

The organization’s information technology (IT) strategy (D) is also a possible source of information for the information security manager to consult, but it is not the most useful one. The IT strategy is a strategy that defines the IT vision, goals, and initiatives of the organization, and how IT supports and enables the business processes and activities. The information security manager should review the IT strategy to understand the IT infrastructure, systems, and services of the organization, and how they relate to the information security program and activities. However, the IT strategy is not the primary driver of the information security strategy, which should be aligned with the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security needs, and not only with the IT objectives, capabilities, and requirements.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy Development, page 23-241

Integrating information security into existing change management processes ensures that security considerations are included in all application changes and deployments. This addresses the root cause of bypassed security reviews and provides a consistent, repeatable process to manage risk going forward.

“Integrating security into change management ensures that changes to systems and applications undergo appropriate security review and testing prior to implementation, thereby addressing vulnerabilities proactively.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Change Management*

The best thing to include in a business case when the return on investment (ROI) for an information security initiative is difficult to calculate is an estimated reduction in risk. Risk reduction is the expected benefit of implementing an information security initiative, as it reduces the likelihood and impact of threats and vulnerabilities that may affect the organization’s information assets and systems. By estimating the reduction in risk, the information security manager can demonstrate the value and benefits of the information security initiative to the organization’s performance, reputation, and competitiveness. The information security manager can also compare the estimated reduction in risk with the estimated cost of the information security initiative to determine its cost-effectiveness and feasibility. The other options are not the best thing to include in a business case, although they may be some inputs or outputs of the risk assessment process. A projected increase in maturity level is a potential outcome of implementing an information security initiative, as it improves the organization’s capabilities and processes for managing information security risks. However, it does not necessarily reflect the actual reduction in risk or the ROI of the information security initiative. A projected cost over time is a component of calculating the ROI of an information security initiative, as it reflects the total cost of ownership and maintenance of the initiative. However, it does not indicate the expected benefit or value of the initiative. An estimated increase in efficiency is a possible benefit of implementing an information security initiative, as it may enhance the organization’s productivity and performance. However, it may not be directly related to the reduction in risk or the ROI of the information security initiative.

The development phase is the stage of the system development life cycle (SDLC) where the system requirements, design, architecture, and implementation are performed. The development phase is most challenging to implement security controls because it involves complex and dynamic processes that may not be well understood or documented. Security controls are essential for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its data, as well as for complying with regulatory and contractual obligations. However, security controls may also introduce additional costs, risks, and constraints to the development process, such as:

Increased complexity and overhead of testing, verification, validation, and maintenance

Reduced flexibility and agility of changing requirements or design

Increased dependency on external vendors or third parties for security services or products

Increased vulnerability to errors, defects, or vulnerabilities in the code or configuration

Increased difficulty in measuring and reporting on security performance or effectiveness

Therefore, implementing security controls in the development phase requires careful planning, coordination, communication, and collaboration among all stakeholders involved in the SDLC. It also requires a clear understanding of the security objectives, scope, criteria, standards, policies, procedures, roles, responsibilities, and resources for the system. Moreover, it requires a proactive approach to identifying and mitigating potential threats or risks that may affect the security of the system.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

The percentage of vendors that are regularly reviewed against defined criteria is the best indicator of the maturity level of a vendor risk management process, as it reflects the extent to which the organization has established and implemented a consistent, repeatable, and effective process to monitor and evaluate the security performance and compliance of its vendors. A high percentage indicates a mature process that covers all vendors and applies clear and relevant criteria based on the organization’s risk appetite and objectives. A low percentage indicates a less mature process that may be ad hoc, incomplete, or outdated. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

The incident response team can best leverage the results of a business impact analysis (BIA) by assigning restoration priority during incidents. A BIA is a process that identifies and evaluates the criticality and dependency of the organization’s business functions, processes, and resources, and the potential impacts and consequences of their disruption or loss. The BIA results provide the basis for determining the recovery objectives, strategies, and plans for the organization’s business continuity and disaster recovery. By using the BIA results, the incident response team can prioritize the restoration of the most critical and time-sensitive business functions, processes, and resources, and allocate the appropriate resources, personnel, and time to minimize the impact and duration of the incident.

Determining total cost of ownership (TCO) (B) is not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not directly related to incident response. TCO is a financial metric that estimates the total direct and indirect costs of owning and operating an asset or a system over its lifecycle. TCO may be useful for evaluating the cost-effectiveness and return on investment of different security solutions or alternatives, but it does not help the incident response team to respond to or recover from an incident.

Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery © is also not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not a primary responsibility of the incident response team. Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery is a part of the vendor management process, which involves selecting, contracting, monitoring, and reviewing the vendors that provide essential products or services to support the organization’s business continuity and disaster recovery. Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery may be done before or after an incident, but not during an incident, as it does not contribute to the incident response or restoration activities.

Calculating residual risk after the incident recovery phase (D) is also not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not a timely or effective use of the BIA results. Residual risk is the risk that remains after the implementation of risk treatment or mitigation measures. Calculating residual risk after the incident recovery phase may be done as a part of the incident review or improvement process, but not during the incident response or restoration phase, as it does not help the incident response team to resolve or contain the incident.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan, Subsection: Business Impact Analysis, page 182-1831

An effective information security awareness training program should aim to improve the knowledge, skills and behavior of the employees regarding information security. One of the ways to measure the effectiveness of such a program is to conduct phishing simulations, which are mock phishing attacks that test the employees’ ability to identify and report phishing emails. An increase in the identification rate during phishing simulations indicates that the employees have learned how to recognize and avoid phishing attempts, which is one of the common threats to information security. Therefore, this is the best indication of an effective information security awareness training program among the given options.

The other options are not as reliable or relevant as indicators of an effective information security awareness training program. An increase in the frequency of phishing tests does not necessarily mean that the employees are learning from them or that the tests are aligned with the learning objectives of the program. An increase in positive user feedback may reflect the satisfaction or engagement of the employees with the program, but it does not measure the actual learning outcomes or behavior changes. An increase in the speed of incident resolution may be influenced by other factors, such as the availability and efficiency of the incident response team, the severity and complexity of the incidents, or the tools and processes used for incident management. Moreover, the speed of incident resolution does not reflect the prevention or reduction of incidents, which is a more desirable goal of an information security awareness training program. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 201-202, 207-208.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1001.

= Documenting incident notification and escalation processes is the most critical step when creating an incident response plan, as this ensures that the appropriate stakeholders are informed and involved in the response process. Identifying vulnerable data assets, what constitutes an incident, and aligning with the risk assessment process are important, but not as critical as documenting the communication and escalation procedures. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1631; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 282