Free Isaca CGEIT Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

 When introducing the concept of governance to the new acquisition, it is most important that executive management recognize the impact of cultural changes. This is because culture can influence how people understand and practice governance, and how they respond to different governance frameworks and policies1. Culture can also change over time, either by choice or by external factors, and this can affect the governance arrangements of an organization2. Therefore, executive management needs to be aware of the cultural differences and similarities between the multinational enterprise and the new acquisition, and how they can affect the governance objectives, processes, and outcomes. Executive management also needs to respect and value the cultural diversity of the new acquisition, and foster a culture of trust, collaboration, and alignment3. References: How corporate culture affects governance - The CEO Magazine3, Governance | Diversity of Cultural Expressions - UNESCO4, 2.0 Culture and governance - AIGI

 An IT investment portfolio is a collection of IT projects, programs, and services that are funded and implemented by an enterprise to achieve its strategic and operational objectives. An IT investment portfolio should be reviewed first to ensure IT congruence with the new business strategy, as it would help to align the IT investments with the business goals, priorities, and needs. A review of the IT investment portfolio would also help to identify and evaluate the current and planned IT initiatives, assess their costs, benefits, risks, and value, and optimize the allocation of IT resources and capabilities. The other options are not as relevant, as they are more related to the execution or delivery of IT activities, rather than the planning or direction of them. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.1: IT Investment ManagementOverview, Page 97 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.4: IT Investment Management Process, Page 104 : The Power of IT Investment Risk Quantification and Visualization: IT Portfolio Management

The primary motivation behind establishing an IT risk management framework is to promote responsibility throughout the enterprise for managing IT risk. An IT risk management framework is a set of principles, processes, and practices that guide and support the identification, analysis, evaluation, treatment, monitoring, and communication of IT-related risks. An IT risk management framework helps to ensure that IT risks are aligned with the enterprise’s objectives, strategies, and risk appetite, and that they are effectively managed by the appropriate stakeholders. An IT risk management framework also helps to foster a culture of risk awareness and accountability within the enterprise

Before implementing an information architecture that restricts access to data based on sensitivity, the enterprise must establish the classification and ownership of the data. Classification is the process of tagging data according to its type, sensitivity, and value to the organization if altered, stolen, or destroyed. It helps the organization understand the risk and impact of data breaches and comply with relevant regulations. Ownership is the process of assigning roles andresponsibilities for data creation, maintenance, protection, and disposal. It helps the organization ensure accountability and governance of data throughout its lifecycle

Applying behavioral change management is the greatest challenge to implementing IT governance, as it involves changing the culture, mindset, and behavior of the people who are affected by or involved in IT governance. IT governance is not just a technical or procedural issue, but also a human and organizational one. Therefore, it requires effective communication, education, motivation, and leadership to ensure that the stakeholders understand, accept, and support the IT governance objectives, principles, and practices. The other options are not as challenging, as they can be addressed by following established methods, frameworks, and standards for IT governance. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.2: IT Governance Frameworks and Standards, Subsection 1.2.1: IT Governance Frameworks and Standards Overview, Page 17 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.4: Implementing and Maintaining an IT Governance Framework, Subsection 1.4.2: Implementing an IT Governance Framework, Page 29 : CGEIT Preparation Tips and the Timelessness of Good Governance1

Mapping business processes within a framework is the most effective way to understand the business activities associated with the enterprise’s information architecture, as it provides a clear and comprehensive view of how information flows and supports the businessobjectives. References:= CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic C: Information Governance, Task 1: Define and implement information governance processes to ensure alignment with enterprise goals and objectives.

 The first step in implementing IT governance is to ensure that IT roles and responsibilities are established. This means that the board of directors should define the authority, accountability, and decision rights of the key stakeholders involved in IT governance, such as the board itself, senior management, business units, IT function, and external parties. By doing so, the board can ensure that IT governance is aligned with the enterprise governance and strategy, and that IT performance and value delivery are monitored and evaluated. Establishing IT roles and responsibilities is also a prerequisite for defining IT policies and procedures, developing a portfolio of IT-enabled investments, and implementing an IT balanced scorecard. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT1; COBIT 5: Enabling Processes, chapter 4, section 4.1.12; Improve IT Governance to Drive Business Results

 An information steward is a person who is responsible for ensuring the quality, accuracy, consistency, and usability of the data in an organization. An information steward works with the business users and stakeholders to understand their data needs, requirements, and expectations, and to define and implement the data policies, standards, and rules that govern the data lifecycle. An information steward also monitors and reports on the data quality issues and trends, and initiates and coordinates the data improvement actions and projects12.

The most important attribute of an information steward is to be closely aligned with the business function, because this can help to ensure that the data supports the business goals and objectives, that the data meets the business expectations and requirements, that the data is relevant and useful for the business decisions and actions, and that the data is aligned with the business processes and workflows12.

The information steward does not necessarily manage the systems that process the relevant data, as this may be done by other IT roles, such as data engineers, data analysts, or data administrators. The information steward does not need to have expertise in managing data quality systems, as this may be a technical skill that can be acquired or supported by other IT roles or tools. The information steward does not need to be part of the information architecture group, as this may be a separate function that focuses on designing and maintaining the data structures, models, and standards12. References: Information Steward settings option descriptions - SAP Online Help. What is an Information Steward, and Why You Should Care?. 6 Key Responsibilities of the Invaluable Data Steward - Dun & Bradstreet.

 According to the CGEIT certification guide, key risk indicators (KRIs) are the best way to provide ongoing assurance that significant IT risk is being proactively monitored and does not exceed agreed risk tolerance levels. KRIs are metrics that measure the likelihood or impact of potential or actual risks, and provide early warning signals of increasing risk exposures1. KRIs can help IT management to track and report the status and trends of IT risks, and to trigger timely responses and actions when the risk levels approach or exceed the predefined thresholds2. The other options are less suitable than option C, as they do not provide ongoing assurance or proactive monitoring of IT risk. An IT risk appetite statement is a document that expresses the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to take in order to meet their strategic objectives3. A risk management policy is a document that defines the principles, framework, and processes for managing risks in an organization. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the identified risks, their causes, impacts, likelihood, responses, and owners.

References :=

CGEIT certification guide, domain 3: Risk Optimization, section 3.4: Risk Monitoring and Assurance, page 98.

Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - Definition from KWHS

Risk Appetite - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Risk Management Policy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Risk Register - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

The first thing that should be done when developing the metadata management process for the new software platform is to request an impact analysis. An impact analysis is a process of assessing the potential effects of a change on the existing system, processes, and stakeholders1. An impact analysis can help to identify the following aspects2:

The scope and objectives of the change: What are the expected benefits and outcomes of the new software platform? How does it align with the enterprise strategy and goals?

The current state and baseline: What are the existing data sources, formats, standards, and quality levels? How are they documented, stored, and accessed? Who are the data owners, stewards, and users?

The gaps and risks: What are the data changes that will occur due to the new software platform? How will they affect the data quality, security, privacy, and compliance? What are the potential challenges or issues that may arise during or after the transition?

The mitigation and contingency plans: How can the data changes be minimized or avoided? How can the data quality, security, privacy, and compliance be ensured or improved? What are the alternative solutions or fallback options in case of failure or disruption?

By requesting an impact analysis, the organization can gain a better understanding of the data environment and the implications of the new software platform. This can help to develop a metadata management process that is consistent, effective, and adaptable to the change. References: Impact Analysis: A Key Aspect of Preventing Problems | Project …1, Impact Analysis: The Key to Successful Change Management2

According to the CGEIT certification guide, the balanced scorecard is the most effective means for IT management to report to executive management regarding the value of IT. The balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that translates the vision and strategy of an organization into a comprehensive set of performance measures that provide the framework for a strategic measurement and management system1. The balanced scorecard enables IT management to communicate the value of IT in terms of four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth2. The balanced scorecard helps IT management to align IT objectives with business objectives, monitor and improve IT performance, and demonstrate IT contribution to business value3.

The other options are less effective than option D, as they do not provide a comprehensive and balanced view of the value of IT. IT process maturity level is a measure of how well-defined, managed, measured, and optimized an IT process is4. While it can indicate the quality and efficiency of IT processes, it does not directly link them to business outcomes or value. Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of an IT project or investment. While it can show the financial return of IT initiatives, it does not capture the non-financial aspects of IT value, such as customer satisfaction, innovation, or learning. Resource assessment is a process that evaluates the availability and utilization of IT resources, such as people, technology, or information. While it can show the capacity and capability of IT resources, it does not measure how they support the business strategy or goals.

References :=

CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.3: Value Governance, page 147.

CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.4: Performance Measurement and Reporting, page 150.

Balanced Scorecard - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

IT Process Maturity - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

[Cost-Benefit Analysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

[Resource Assessment - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

The responsibility that should be retained within an enterprise when outsourcing a project management office (PMO) function is selecting projects. This is because selecting projects is a strategic decision that involves aligning the project portfolio with the enterprise goals, vision, and mission. Selecting projects also requires understanding the business needs, priorities, and value proposition of each project, as well as the available resources, risks, and opportunities. These are aspects that the enterprise should have more knowledge and authority over than theoutsourced PMO provider. Outsourcing the project selection process may result in a loss of control, alignment, and accountability for the enterprise. Therefore, selecting projects is a responsibility that should be retained within an enterprise when outsourcing a PMO function.

Incident severity and downtime trend analysis is the most important result to report to the CIO to measure progress in improving system availability to mitigate IT risk to the business, because it directly reflects the impact and frequency of system failures or disruptions on the business operations, processes, and functions. By analyzing the severity and duration of incidents over time, the CIO can evaluate the effectiveness of the IT risk management and system availability strategies, and identify any gaps, issues, or opportunities for improvement. Incident severity and downtime trend analysis can also help the CIO to communicate the value and performance of the IT risk management and system availability initiatives to the business stakeholders, and justify any further investment or action required to achieve the desired outcomes.

The other options are not as important as incident severity and downtime trend analysis, because they are either too indirect or too subjective to measure progress in improving system availability to mitigate IT risk to the business. Probability and severity of each IT risk is a useful input for IT risk management, but it does not necessarily reflect the actual occurrence or impact of system failures or disruptions on the business1. Financial losses and bad press releases are possible consequences of system failures or disruptions, but they may not capture the full extent or root causes of the IT risk to the business2. Customer and stakeholder complaints over time are indicators of customer satisfaction and loyalty, but they may not be reliable or consistent measures of system availability or IT risk to the business

 Gap analysis results will provide the most useful information for the CIO to determine if IT staff have adequate skills to deliver on key strategic objectives, as they compare the current state ofthe IT staff skills with the desired or required state. Gap analysis results also help to identify the gaps or deficiencies in the IT staff skills, and to plan and implement the actions and strategies to close or reduce the gaps1. A gap analysis can be performed using various methods and tools, such as SWOT analysis, skill matrix, competency framework, etc.

The security status of a new business acquisition is a critical factor that can affect the value, performance, and reputation of the acquiring company. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a thorough IT risk assessment of the target company as part of the overall due diligence process. An IT risk assessment can help to identify and evaluate the current and potential cybersecurity threats, vulnerabilities, and controls in the target company’s IT environment, as well as the compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An IT risk assessment can also help to estimate the costs and efforts required to remediate any security gaps or issues, and to align the security policies and standards of both parties. By integrating IT risk assessment into the due diligence process, the acquiring company can make informed decisions about the feasibility, valuation, and integration of the new business acquisition12. References: Due diligence for Mergers and Acquisitions through a cybersecurity lens. Microsoft Security tips for mitigating risk in mergers and acquisitions.