Free Isaca CGEIT Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 13

The main goal of the IT strategy committee after establishing stakeholder desired outcomes should be to ensure IT risk alignment with enterprise risk. IT risk alignment means that the IT risk management program is consistent and integrated with the enterprise risk management (ERM) program, and that the IT risks are identified, assessed, and treated in relation to the enterprise’s objectives, strategies, and risk appetite. IT risk alignment can help the enterprise achieve the following benefits1:

Enhance the value delivery of IT to the business

Improve the decision making and prioritization of IT investments and initiatives

Reduce the likelihood and impact of IT-related incidents and losses

Increase the resilience and agility of IT in responding to changes and disruptions

Strengthen the governance and accountability of IT performance and compliance

To ensure IT risk alignment with enterprise risk, the IT strategy committee should perform the following tasks2:

Define the scope, objectives, and criteria for IT risk management

Establish the roles and responsibilities for IT risk management

Align the IT risk management framework and processes with the ERM framework and processes

Communicate and collaborate with the ERM function and other stakeholders on IT risk issues

Monitor and review the effectiveness and maturity of IT risk management

The other options are not the main goal of the IT strategy committee after establishing stakeholder desired outcomes. Identifying business data that requires protection, performing a risk analysis on key IT processes, and implementing controls to address high risk areas are steps that are part of the IT risk management process, but they are not specific to ensuring IT risk alignment with enterprise risk. These steps should be done by the IT risk management function or team, under the guidance and oversight of the IT strategy committee.

 This should be the committee’s first recommendation, as it will help to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of using personal smartphones to conduct corporate business1. A risk assessment will also help to determine the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to protect the corporate information and assets, as well as comply with the relevant regulations and standards1. The other options are not as important as performing a risk assessment, as they are dependent on the outcome of this step. Documenting procedures for securing personal devices, improving training courses on securing corporate information, and updating the corporate security policy to include personal devices are possible actions that may be taken after performing a risk assessment, based on the identified risks and their levels2.

According to the ISACA CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, one of the tasks under the domain of Strategic Alignment is to "understand the current vision and direction of the enterprise and identify how IT can best support it."1 This task should be done first when developing an IT strategic plan that supports an enterprise’s business goals, because it provides the basis for aligning IT with the business strategy and priorities. By understanding the current vision and direction of the enterprise, the IT strategic plan can identify the gaps, opportunities, and challenges that need to be addressed by IT, as well as the expected outcomes and benefits that IT can deliver to the enterprise23. The other options are not the best actions to perform first in this scenario. Ensuring that IT drives business goals, analyzing benchmarking data, and performing a business impact analysis (BIA) are all useful steps or methods for developing an IT strategic plan, but they are not the starting point. They should be done after understanding the current vision and direction of the enterprise, based on the alignment and integration of IT with the business strategy and goals23. References:

1: https://www.isaca.org/-/media/info/cgeit/cgeit-exam-candidate-guide.pdf

2: https://www.cascade.app/blog/it-strategic-plan

3: https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/it-governance-frameworks-definitions

The success of an enterprise’s IT governance framework is ultimately measured by the extent to which it enables the achievement of enterprise goals and objectives. One of the key aspects of IT governance is ensuring that IT investments are aligned with business needs and deliver value to the enterprise. Therefore, a high percentage of IT investments delivering expected benefits indicates that the IT governance framework is effective and successful. References :=

CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.1: Introduction to GEIT, Subsection 1.1.2: Benefits of GEIT, Page 9

CGEIT Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.1: Introduction to GEIT, Subsection 1.1.2: Benefits of GEIT, Page 9

Developing an effective IT governance framework - Wavestone1

Organizational culture is the most important consideration when designing an implementation plan for IT governance, because it influences the ethics, values, behaviors, and attitudes of the people involved in the governance process. Organizational culture also affects the acceptance, adoption, and sustainability of the IT governance framework and practices. According to COBIT 5, one of the seven enablers of IT governance is culture, ethics and behavior1. The roadmap for implementing and improving IT governance also emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the cultural and behavioral aspects of the enterprise2. References := 1: COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, ISACA, page 312: A Roadmap for Implementing and Improving IT Governance1

This is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT, as it creates inconsistency and fragmentation in the IT governance process across the enterprise. Strategic alignment of business and IT is the degree of fit and integration among business strategy, IT strategy, business infrastructure, and IT infrastructure1. It helps to ensure that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to the stakeholders1. To achieve strategic alignment, an enterprise needs to have a coherent and coordinated IT governance process that aligns IT with business goals, optimizes IT investments and resources, manages IT risks and opportunities, and measures IT performance and benefits1. However, if each business unit has its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization, this may result in conflicting or competing IT priorities, duplication or waste of IT resources, lack of communication or collaboration among IT stakeholders, or misalignment of IT services and capabilities with business needs and expectations1. Therefore, each business unit having its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT.

The other options are not barriers to strategic alignment of business and IT, as they are possible enablers or indicators of strategic alignment. Uniform portfolio management is the process of selecting, prioritizing, balancing, and monitoring the IT investments and initiatives that support the enterprise’s strategic objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders2. Uniform portfolio management can help to align IT with business goals, optimize resource allocation, manage risks and dependencies, and measure performance and benefits2. IT being the exclusive provider of IT services to the business units can help to ensure that the IT services are consistent, reliable, secure, and compliant with the enterprise’s standards and policies3. The enterprise’s CIO being a member of the executive committee can help to demonstrate the strategic importance and contribution of IT to the enterprise’s success, as well as facilitate the communication and collaboration between IT and business leaders4.

 Guiding principles and best practices are the most important elements to document for a business ethics program, because they provide the foundation and direction for the program. Guiding principles are the core values and beliefs that inform the ethical behavior and decision-making of the organization and its stakeholders. Best practices are the methods and techniques that have been proven to be effective and efficient in achieving the desired ethical outcomes. Documenting guiding principles and best practices helps to communicate the purpose, scope, and objectives of the business ethics program, as well as the roles and responsibilities, policies and procedures, standards and expectations, and evaluation and improvement mechanisms. Documenting guiding principles and best practices also helps to align the business ethics program with the organizational strategy and culture, and to foster a consistent and coherent ethical environment.

References := How to Build a Business Ethics Program - Bizmanualz, A Guide for Business How to develop a Human rights Policy.

The scope and stakeholders of the audit are the most important information to provide to the consultant before the audit begins, because they define the objectives, boundaries, and expectations of the audit. The scope and stakeholders of the audit are also part of the IT governance domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT1. References := 1: CGEIT Review Manual 2023, ISACA, page 23.

The most important course of action for IT senior management to improve IT governance within the organization is to understand the driver that led to a desire to change. IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to the stakeholders1. IT governance is influenced by various internal and external factors, such as business strategy, customer expectations, regulatory requirements, industry standards, best practices, and emerging technologies1. Therefore, before initiating any improvement initiatives, IT senior management should first identify and analyze the driver that prompted the board of directors to request a change in IT governance. This will help them to understand the current situation, the desired state, the gap between them, and the rationale and urgency for improvement2. By understanding the driver that led to a desire to change, IT senior management can also align their improvement efforts with the board’s vision and expectations, communicate the benefits and challenges of change, and gain their support and commitment2. References: CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version) or CGEIT Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.1: IT Governance Frameworks and Principles, Page 9-10. What is CGEIT? A certification for seasoned IT governance professionals.

This is because social media can offer many advantages for an enterprise, such as enhancing customer engagement, increasing brand awareness, improving market intelligence, and fostering innovation. However, social media also poses many challenges and threats, such as data breaches, privacy violations, reputational damage, legal liabilities, and compliance issues. Therefore, an enterprise needs to balance the business benefits and risk of using social media in the workplace, and establish a clear and consistent social media policy and governance framework that defines the objectives, roles, responsibilities, standards, and processes for managing social media activities and data.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to create a social media governance plan that covers the key elements of a social media policy, compliance management, security and risk mitigation, decision-making and approval workflow, and crisis management.

2: This source discusses the gaps, risks, and opportunities of social media governance in the context of Australian public communication. It identifies some of the best practices and recommendations for developing and implementing a social media strategy that aligns with the organizational goals and values, as well as the legal and ethical obligations.

3: This source explores the social media governance challenges and solutions for financial services companies. It highlights the importance of balancing the business benefits and risk of social media, and suggests some of the key steps to achieve effective social media governance, such as conducting a risk assessment, defining a social media policy, establishing a governance structure, monitoring and measuring performance, and reviewing and updating the strategy.

An independent assessment is a review by a third party of an authorization decision, a product, a service, or a system to verify its quality, functionality, compliance, or performance. An independent assessment can help identify and mitigate potential risks, errors, or defects before they cause problems or failures. An independent assessment can also provide an objective and unbiased opinion on the suitability and effectiveness of a solution for a specific purpose or context.

By requiring an independent assessment of solutions prior to implementation, the enterprise can ensure that the solutions meet the functional requirements and specifications, as well as the security and privacy standards and policies. This can prevent issues such as the malfunctioning of role-based access control, which could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive data. An independent assessment can also help evaluate the compatibility and interoperability of solutions with existing systems and processes, and provide recommendations for improvement or optimization.

Some examples of independent assessment methods are:

Independent verification and validation (IV&V): A process that checks whether a system meets its defined requirements and specifications, and whether it fulfills its intended purpose and functions.

Independent technical review (ITR): A process that evaluates the technical aspects of a system, such as its design, architecture, performance, reliability, security, usability, maintainability, and scalability.

Independent security assessment (ISA): A process that assesses the security posture of a system, such as its vulnerability to threats, its compliance with security standards and regulations, its implementation of security controls and measures, and its response to security incidents.

Process owners are the individuals or groups who are responsible for the design, execution, and improvement of a business process. Process owners have a deep understanding of the business needs, goals, and challenges that the process aims to address. By involving process owners in requirements gathering, the CIO can ensure that the IT enterprise roadmap meets the business requirements and expectations, and that the IT solutions align with the business processes and outcomes. Process owners can also provide valuable feedback and insights on the feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of the IT solutions, and help to prioritize and validate the IT initiatives and deliverables. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Definitive Guide to Developing an IT Strategy and Roadmap - CioPages2, What is a Process Owner? | Lean Six Sigma Group3

 Business use cases are descriptions of the business processes, scenarios, and interactions that support the achievement of a specific business goal or objective1. By considering the business use cases supporting the digital strategy, the enterprise can ensure that the information architecture is aligned with and driven by the business needs and expectations2. The information architecture can also support the communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes among the stakeholders involved in the digital strategy2.

The other options are not as important as the business use cases supporting the digital strategy, as they are either specific aspects or outcomes of information architecture, but not comprehensive factors. Resource constraints related to implementing the digital strategy are the limitations and challenges that affect the availability and quality of the resources required for executing the digital strategy, such as time, money, people, technology, or data3. Resource constraints can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many criteria that evaluate information architecture3. Changes to the legacy business and data architectures are the modifications and adaptations that are needed to update and improve the existing business and data structures, models, and systems to align with the digital strategy4. Changes to the legacy business and data architectures can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many components that constitute information architecture4. The history of fraud incidents and their root causes are the records and analyses of the previous fraud events and their underlying factors that occurred within or against the enterprise5. The history of fraud incidents and their root causes can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many sources of information that inform information architecture5.

According to the web search results, projects where management has a choice in implementing them are called discretionary projects. Projects where no choice exists are called nondiscretionary projects1. Compliance with statutory regulations is a nondiscretionary project, as it is required by law and cannot be avoided or postponed. The other options are discretionary projects, as they are based on the management’s decision and preference, and can be prioritized or delayed according to the business needs and goals. References: CGEIT Certification, CIO Dashboard, Answers

The most significant challenge faced by an enterprise when establishing information stewardship is the lack of role clarity and specific responsibilities, as this can lead to confusion, duplication, inconsistency, or omission of tasks and activities related to information governance. Information stewardship is the role of providing day-to-day operational support using data, such as defining and implementing data policies, standards, and procedures; monitoring and reporting on data compliance and performance; and collaborating with other stakeholders to ensure data quality, integrity, and security1. Information stewardship requires clear and consistent definition of the scope, objectives, and expectations of the role, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the information stewards and their relationship with other data owners, users, or scientists1. Withoutrole clarity and specific responsibilities, information stewardship may not be effective or efficient in achieving the desired outcomes or benefits of information governance.

Lack of documented policies and procedures, information requirements of regulatory authorities, and insufficient knowledge of IT practices and controls are also challenges faced by an enterprise when establishing information stewardship, but they are not the most significant challenge. Lack of documented policies and procedures is a challenge that can affect the standardization and improvement of information governance processes and activities, as well as the communication and enforcement of data rules and expectations. Information requirements of regulatory authorities are a challenge that can affect the compliance and accountability of information governance, as well as the protection and privacy of data. Insufficient knowledge of IT practices and controls is a challenge that can affect the technical skills and capabilities of information stewards, as well as their ability to use or integrate data systems or tools.

References := What is an Information Steward? | Informatica; What is an Information Steward, and Why You Should Care; What is an Information Steward, and Why You Should Care?.