Free Isaca CDPSE Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

The primary consideration to ensure control of remote access is aligned to the privacy policy is that access is only granted to authorized users. This means that the organization should implement and enforce policies and procedures to identify, authenticate, and authorize users who need to access personal data remotely, such as employees, contractors, or service providers. The organization should also define and communicate the roles and responsibilities of remote users, and the terms and conditions of remote access, such as the purpose, scope, duration, and security measures. By granting access only to authorized users, the organization can protect data privacy by preventing unauthorized or unnecessary access, use, disclosure, or transfer of personal data. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 107

When contracting with a SaaS provider, it is important to ensure that the provider will remove all customer data from their systems and storage devices at the end of the service contract. This will prevent any unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of the customer data by the provider or third parties after the service termination. Removal of customer data means that the data are permanently erased and cannot be recovered or restored by any means.

References:

• ISACA, Data Privacy Audit/Assurance Program, Control Objective 9: Data Disposal, p. 16-171
• ISACA, CDPSE Review Manual 2021, Chapter 4: Privacy Incident Response, Section 4.2: Data Disposal and Destruction, p. 151-152.

Incorporating privacy checkpoints into the secure development life cycle (SDLC) is the best way to avoid collecting personal data that was not part of the privacy impact assessment (PIA). Privacy checkpoints are stages in the SDLC where privacy requirements and risks are reviewed and validated, and any changes or deviations from the original PIA are identified and addressed. Privacy checkpoints help ensure that privacy is embedded throughout the system design and development, and that any changes are documented and approved.

References:

• ISACA, CDPSE Review Manual 2021, Chapter 3: Privacy by Design, Section 3.2: Privacy Engineering, p. 97-98.

 Irreversible disposal is a process of removing or destroying data from a storage device or media to prevent unauthorized access or recovery of the data. Irreversible disposal is the most important thing to establish within a data storage policy to protect data privacy, as it reflects the principles of data minimization and storage limitation, which require limiting the collection, storage and processing of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes, and deleting or disposing of personal data when it is no longer needed or justified. Irreversible disposal also helps to reduce the privacy risks and costs associated with data storage and retention, such as data breaches, unauthorized access, misuse or loss of data. The other options are not as important as irreversible disposal in protecting data privacy within a data storage policy. Data redaction is a technique that removes or obscures sensitive or confidential information from a document or file, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion. Data quality assurance (QA) is a process of ensuring that the data meets the standards and specifications of accuracy, completeness, consistency and reliability, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion. Collection limitation is a principle that requires limiting the collection of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion1, p. 75-76 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

A privacy audit is a systematic and independent examination of an organization’s privacy policies, procedures, practices, and controls to assess their compliance with applicable laws, regulations, standards, and best practices. A privacy audit may result in various outputs, such as findings, recommendations, observations, or opinions. Among the options given, the output that is most likely to trigger remedial action is the identification of deficiencies in how personal data is shared with third parties. This is because such deficiencies may pose significant risks to the privacy and security of the data subjects, as well as to the reputation and legal liability of the organization. Remedial action may include implementing contractual safeguards, technical measures, or organizational changes to ensure that third parties respect and protect the personal data they receive from the organization.

References: CDPSE Review Manual, 2021, p. 181

The best way to ensure an organization’s enterprise risk management (ERM) framework can protect the organization from privacy harms is to complete a privacy risk assessment. A privacy risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the privacy risks that may affect the organization’s objectives, operations, stakeholders, and reputation. A privacy risk assessment helps to align the ERM framework with the privacy requirements, expectations, and obligations of the organization, as well as to prioritize and mitigate the privacy risks that may cause privacy harms. Privacy harms are the adverse consequences or impacts that may result from the unauthorized or inappropriate use, disclosure, or loss of personal data, such as financial loss, identity theft, discrimination, reputational damage, emotional distress, or physical harm.

References: CDPSE Review Manual, 2021, p. 84

The most important consideration for developing data retention requirements is the applicable regulations that govern the data. Different types of data may be subject to different legal and regulatory obligations, such as how long the data must be kept, how it must be protected, and how it can be accessed or disposed of. Failing to comply with these obligations can result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, or reputational damage for the organization. Therefore, it is essential to identify and follow the applicable regulations for each data category.

References:

• Data Retention Policy 101: Best Practices, Examples & More - Intradyn
• Data retention - Wikipedia

In GDPR parlance, organizations that use third-party service providers are often, but not always, considered data controllers, which are entities that determine the purposes and means of the processing of personal data, which can include directing third parties to process personal data on their behalf. The third parties that process data for data controllers are known as data processors.

The best way to protect personal data in the custody of a third party is to include requirements to comply with the organization’s privacy policies in the contract. This means that the organization should specify the terms and conditions of data processing, such as the purpose, scope, duration, and security measures, and ensure that they are consistent with the organization’s privacy policies and applicable privacy regulations. The contract should also define the roles and responsibilities of both parties, such as data controller and data processor, and establish mechanisms for monitoring, reporting, auditing, and resolving any issues or incidents related to data privacy. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 41

Domain name system (DNS) sinkhole is a technology that redirects malicious or unwanted domain names to alternative destinations, such as a fake or harmless website, a warning page, or a null address. DNS sinkhole is the most effective technology deployed at an enterprise level to block malicious tracking of user internet browsing, as it would prevent users from accessing websites that use tracking technologies, such as cookies, web beacons, or fingerprinting, to collect and analyze user behavior or preferences. DNS sinkhole would also protect users from other malicious activities, such as malware distribution, phishing attempts, or botnet command and control. The other options are not as effective as DNS sinkhole in blocking malicious tracking of user internet browsing at an enterprise level. Web application firewall (WAF) is a technology that monitors and filters incoming and outgoing web traffic to protect web applications from attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, or denial-of-service (DoS), but it does not block malicious tracking of user internet browsing. Website URL blacklisting is a method of blocking access to websites that are known or suspected to be malicious or harmful, but it does not block malicious tracking of user internet browsing from unknown or legitimate websites that use tracking technologies. Desktop antivirus software is a technology that scans and removes viruses, malware, spyware, or other threats from desktop computers or devices, but it does not block malicious tracking of user internet browsing from websites that use tracking technologies1, p. 92 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Compartmentalizing resource access is a security technique that divides a system or network into separate segments or zones with different levels of access and control, based on the sensitivity and value of the data or resources. Compartmentalizing resource access would most effectively reduce the impact of a successful breach through a remote access solution, as it would limit the scope and extent of the breach, and prevent unauthorized access to other segments or zones that contain more critical or sensitive data or resources. The other options are not as effective as compartmentalizing resource access in reducing the impact of a successful breach through a remote access solution. Regular testing of system backups is a security technique that verifies the availability and recoverability of data in case of a system failure or disaster, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data. Monitoring and reviewing remote access logs is a security technique that records and analyzes the activities and events related to remote access sessions, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data. Regular physical and remote testing of the incident response plan is a security technique that evaluates and improves the readiness and effectiveness of an organization’s response to security incidents, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data1, p. 91-92 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)