Achieve Success in the Isaca CGEIT Exam: A Detailed Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam Guide

The finding that should be of greatest concern to senior management is that response decisions were made without consulting the appropriate authority. This is because response decisions are critical actions that can affect the outcome and impact of a security incident, and they should be made by the designated authority who has the responsibility and accountability for the incident response. According to CISA, the Department of Justice, through the FBI and the NCIJTF, is the lead agency for threat response during a significant incident, with DHS’s investigative agencies—the Secret Service and ICE/HSI - playing a crucial role in criminal investigations1. If response decisions are made without consulting the appropriate authority, it may result in:

• Legal or regulatory violations: The response actions may not comply with the applicable laws or regulations, such as data breach notification, evidence preservation, or privacy protection. This may expose the organization to legal or regulatory penalties, lawsuits, or reputational damage.
• Ineffective or counterproductive actions: The response actions may not be aligned with the incident response plan, best practices, or standard operating procedures. This may cause more harm than good, such as escalating the incident, destroying evidence, or compromising recovery efforts.
• Lack of coordination and communication: The response actions may not be coordinated or communicated with the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, legal counsel, public relations, or external partners. This may lead to confusion, inconsistency, or mistrust among the parties involved in the incident response.

Therefore, senior management should be most concerned about the finding that response decisions were made without consulting the appropriate authority, and they should take corrective actions to prevent this from happening again in the future. References: Cybersecurity Incident Response | CISA1

 An organizational change management plan is the best option to have in place prior to the start of an initiative to upgrade the technology and related processes of a rail transport company that has the worst on-time arrival record in the industry due to an antiquated IT system that controls scheduling. An organizational change management plan is a document that outlines the strategy, approach, and actions for managing and implementing a change within an organization. It helps to prepare the organization and its stakeholders for the change, communicate the vision and benefits of the change, address the potential resistance and challenges of the change, and monitor and evaluate the progress and outcomes of the change. An organizational change management plan is especially important for a project that involves a significant technological and process change that may impact the culture, performance, and satisfaction of the employees. By having an organizational change management plan in place before the start of the initiative, the rail transport company can maximize employee engagement throughout the project, and ensure a smooth and successful transition to the new IT system and processes

 An information steward is a person who is responsible for ensuring the quality, accuracy, consistency, and usability of the data in an organization. An information steward works with the business users and stakeholders to understand their data needs, requirements, and expectations, and to define and implement the data policies, standards, and rules that govern the data lifecycle. An information steward also monitors and reports on the data quality issues and trends, and initiates and coordinates the data improvement actions and projects12.

From a governance perspective, the role of an information steward is most important for an enterprise to keep in-house, because it requires a close alignment with the business function, a deep knowledge of the data sources and systems, and a high level of trust and accountability. An information steward is the guardian of the business data, which is a valuable asset and a competitive advantage for any organization. Outsourcing the role of an information steward may pose significant risks to the data security, privacy, quality, and compliance12.

An information auditor is a person who performs independent and objective assessments of the data quality, integrity, and compliance in an organization. An information auditor evaluates the data governance policies, standards, and processes, as well as the data controls and safeguards. An information auditor also provides recommendations for improving the data management practices and mitigating the data risks3. An information auditor can be outsourced to provide an external and unbiased perspective on the data governance performance and issues.

An information architect is a person who designs and maintains the data structures, models, and standards in an organization. An information architect ensures that the data is organized, integrated, accessible, and consistent across different systems and platforms. An information architect also supports the data analysis, reporting, and visualization needs of the organization4. An information architect can be outsourced to leverage the expertise and experience of external consultants or vendors.

An information analyst is a person who collects, processes, analyzes, and interprets the data in an organization. An information analyst uses various tools and techniques to extract insights and value from the data. An information analyst also communicates and presents the data findings and recommendations to support decision making and problem solving in the organization. An information analyst can be outsourced to access specialized skills or technologies that may not be available in-house. References: What is Information Audit? Definition & Process. What is Information Architecture? Definition & Examples. What is an Information Steward? Definition & Role. 6 Key Responsibilities of the Invaluable Data Steward - Dun & Bradstreet. [What is an Information Analyst? Definition & Skills].

According to the CGEIT certification guide, the balanced scorecard is the most effective means for IT management to report to executive management regarding the value of IT. The balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that translates the vision and strategy of an organization into a comprehensive set of performance measures that provide the framework for a strategic measurement and management system1. The balanced scorecard enables IT management to communicate the value of IT in terms of four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth2. The balanced scorecard helps IT management to align IT objectives with business objectives, monitor and improve IT performance, and demonstrate IT contribution to business value3.

The other options are less effective than option D, as they do not provide a comprehensive and balanced view of the value of IT. IT process maturity level is a measure of how well-defined, managed, measured, and optimized an IT process is4. While it can indicate the quality and efficiency of IT processes, it does not directly link them to business outcomes or value. Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of an IT project or investment. While it can show the financial return of IT initiatives, it does not capture the non-financial aspects of IT value, such as customer satisfaction, innovation, or learning. Resource assessment is a process that evaluates the availability and utilization of IT resources, such as people, technology, or information. While it can show the capacity and capability of IT resources, it does not measure how they support the business strategy or goals.

References :=

• CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.3: Value Governance, page 147.
• CGEIT certification guide, domain 4: Benefits Realization, section 4.4: Performance Measurement and Reporting, page 150.
• Balanced Scorecard - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• IT Process Maturity - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• [Cost-Benefit Analysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]
• [Resource Assessment - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

Developing policies on social media is the primary focus of the enterprise approach to reduce the risk of reputational damage by employees outside of the workplace. Policies can define the acceptable and unacceptable use of social media, the roles and responsibilities of employees, and the consequences of policy violations. Policies can also provide guidance and awareness to employees on how to use social media responsibly and ethically. References: CGEIT Domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT

The most important action to address the concern of executive management about the current strategy of executing projects as they are submitted is to create a combined business/IT committee to determine project prioritization. This action will help to ensure that the IT projects are aligned with the enterprise’s objectives, strategies, and values, and that they deliver the highest value and impact to the business and the customers. A combined business/IT committee can also facilitate the communication, collaboration, and coordination among the stakeholders involved in the IT projects, and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise. A combined business/IT committee can use various project prioritization methods, such as scoring models, prioritization matrices, payback periods, or portfolio dashboards, to evaluate and rank the IT projects based on criteria such as business value, urgency, feasibility, risk, and resource availability

The best key risk indicator (KRI) to show progress in IT employee behavior regarding application security issues is the results of application security awareness training quizzes. This KRI measures the level of knowledge and understanding that IT employees have acquired from the security training sessions, and how well they can apply it to their work. This KRI can also help to identify the gaps and weaknesses in the training content and delivery, and suggest areas for improvement. A high score on the quizzes indicates a high level of IT employee risk awareness and a low likelihood of creating serious security issues in application design and configuration

 Quality management is the process of ensuring that the products and services delivered by an organization meet or exceed the expectations and requirements of the customers and stakeholders. Quality management practices include planning, implementing, monitoring, and improving the quality standards and processes for an organization. Applying effective quality management practices can help to manage continuous improvement of governance-related processes, by ensuring that the processes are aligned with the organizational goals and objectives, that the processes are performed consistently and efficiently, that the processes are measured and evaluated for their effectiveness and value, and that the processes are continuously reviewed and enhanced for improvement123. References: What is Quality Management? Definition, Principles, Tools & Examples. Quality Management: The Importance of ISO. Continuous Improvement and a Business Process Governance Framework.

Business management involvement as IT strategies are developed is the best indication of effective IT-business strategic alignment, because it ensures that the IT strategies are aligned with the business goals, needs, and expectations, and that the business stakeholders have a clear understanding and ownership of the IT initiatives. Business management involvement can also facilitate the communication, collaboration, and coordination between the IT and business functions, and help resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise during the IT strategy development process. Business management involvement can also foster a culture of trust, mutual respect, and shared vision between the IT and business functions, and enhance the value proposition and performance of the IT strategies. References := IT Strategic Planning and Alignment: Best Practices, What Is “IT-Business Alignment”?, Aligning IT and Business Strategy for Project Success

The most important consideration for IT governance is to align IT investments with business objectives and deliver value to the enterprise. Cost reduction is one of the possible objectives, but not the only one. Therefore, the business value impact of each option should be evaluated to ensure that the IT investment supports the enterprise strategy and goals. References:= CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 1: Establish and maintain a governance framework that aligns with enterprise objectives, ensures value creation from IT-enabled investments, and manages risk at an acceptable level.

When implementing an IT governance framework, it is important to consider the effects of enterprise culture on the acceptance and adoption of the framework. Enterprise culture is the set of values, beliefs, norms, and behaviors that shape how an organization operates and interacts with its stakeholders. A mismatch between the IT governance framework and the enterprise culture can lead to resistance, conflict, or failure of the framework. Therefore, it is best to factor in the effects of enterprise culture and tailor the framework to suit the specific context and needs of the organization. The other options are not the best way to ensure acceptance of the framework, but rather some of the factors that can influence the design and implementation of the framework. Using subject matter experts, industry-accepted practices, and complying with regulatory requirements can help to ensure the quality, relevance, and compliance of the framework, but they do not necessarily guarantee its acceptance by the organization. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2020, page 12; Implementing Good Governance Principles for the Public Sector in Information Technology Governance Frameworks

Risk appetite is the greatest concern from a governance perspective when two large financial institutions with different corporate cultures are engaged in a merger, because it reflects the amount and type of risk that the organizations are willing to pursue, retain, or take in order to achieve their strategic objectives. Risk appetite is influenced by various factors, such as organizational culture, values, beliefs, and behaviors, as well as external factors, such as market conditions, regulations, and stakeholder expectations. Therefore, if the two merging organizations have different risk appetites, this may create challenges and conflicts in aligning their strategies, policies, processes, and systems. It may also affect their performance, compliance, reputation, and value creation. Therefore, it is important to assess and harmonize the risk appetites of the two organizations and ensure that they are consistent with their merged vision, goals, and needs. References := Good Governance Institute Board guidance on risk appetite, Risk Appetite: A Conversation of Governance, Organisations must define their IT risk appetite and tolerance

 A risk and benefit evaluation is a method of weighing the pros and cons of an action or decision, such as modifying the enterprise information security policy to allow the use of personal equipment for work-related purposes. A risk and benefit evaluation can help identify the potential risks and benefits of such a change, assess their likelihood and impact, and compare them with the current situation or alternative options1. A risk and benefit evaluation can provide a systematic and objective basis for making a decision that balances the needs and interests of different stakeholders, such as IT security, employees, and the organization2. The other options are not the best basis for making a decision on whether to modify the enterprise information security policy. Audit findings are reports that evaluate the compliance and effectiveness of an existing policy or process, but they do not necessarily address the potential risks and benefits of changing it3. User access approval procedures are steps that authorize or deny users to access certain resources or systems, but they do not reflect the overall impact of using personal equipment for work-related purposes4. The impact to security is an important factor to consider, but it is not the only one. There may be other benefits or risks that need to be taken into account, such as productivity, cost, user satisfaction, etc.5 References:

• 5: https://www.osha.gov/personal-protective-equipment
• 4: https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Income-deductions-offsets-and-records/Deductions-you-can-claim/Tools-computers-and-items-you-use-for-work/Tools-and-equipment-to-perform-your-work/
• 3: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/presentation/presentation-periodic-safety-update-report-procedure-concept-benefit-risk-evaluation-r-postigo_en.pdf
• 2: https://safetyculture.com/topics/risk-analysis/
• 1: https://pestleanalysis.com/risk-benefit-analysis/

The scope and stakeholders of the audit are the most important information to provide to the consultant before the audit begins, because they define the objectives, boundaries, and expectations of the audit. The scope and stakeholders of the audit are also part of the IT governance domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT1. References := 1: CGEIT Review Manual 2023, ISACA, page 23.

The first step to address the concern of discrimination against certain demographic groups resulting from the use of machine learning models is to obtain stakeholders’ input regarding the ethics associated with machine learning. This is because stakeholders are the ones who are affected by or have an interest in the outcomes of machine learning models, and their input can help identify the ethical values, principles, and standards that should guide the development and use of machine learning models. Stakeholders’ input can also help ensure that the machine learning models are aligned with the enterprise’s mission, vision, and goals, as well as the legal and regulatory requirements. According to COBIT 5, one of the seven enablers of IT governance is stakeholders1. The Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence project also emphasizes the importance of engaging with diverse stakeholders to ensure that AI systems are fair, accountable, transparent, and human-centric2. References := 1: COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, ISACA, page 312: Algorithms and Justice - Berkman Klein Center