Free CompTIA DY0-001 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

→ With 19,000 unique error codes and only 7 codes per machine (on median), the data structure will likely consist of a very large number of binary features (e.g., one-hot encoded error codes), most of which will be 0 for any given machine. This leads to a sparse matrix—where the majority of elements are zero—which poses computational and modeling challenges.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: Granularity misalignment would mean mismatched levels (e.g., mixing daily and hourly data), which is not the issue here.

C: There are many features (error codes), not too few.

D: Multivariate outliers involve unusual combinations across features, not sparsity.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Study Guide – Section 3.3:“High-cardinality categorical features can result in sparse matrices, especially when one-hot encoded for models.”

→ FULL OUTER JOIN returns all rows from both tables, inserting NULLs where no match exists. This join includes the maximum possible number of records — all matches, plus all unmatched records from both sides.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: INNER JOIN returns only matching rows — less total data.

B & C: LEFT/RIGHT JOIN include all rows from one table only.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Study Guide – Section 5.2:“A FULL OUTER JOIN maximizes data volume by including all matched and unmatched records from both tables.”

SQL for Data Science, Chapter 4:“Use FULL OUTER JOIN when the goal is to preserve every record from both datasets regardless of match.”

—

→ A Type II error occurs when the model fails to identify a positive instance — in this case, a cat. That is, it incorrectly classifies a cat (positive class) as a dog (negative class). This is also referred to as a false negative.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: “Error due to reality” is not a recognized statistical concept.

B: A false positive would mean misclassifying a dog as a cat (opposite error).

C: Sampling error refers to discrepancies between the sample and population, not a misclassification.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 1.5:“Type II errors occur when a model incorrectly identifies a true positive as a negative — also known as a false negative.”

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Chapter 9:“In binary classification, a Type II error means failing to detect a positive class instance, leading to a false negative result.”

→ In the proof-of-concept phase, the first practical step is model selection — identifying which modeling technique is most appropriate based on the nature of the problem, data, and business goal. Literature reviews are helpful but usually precede model experimentation.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Literature review informs planning but isn't the first hands-on step.

B: Performance evaluation comes after models are built.

C: Hyperparameter tuning applies after a model is chosen.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Study Guide – Section 5.1:“Model selection is a critical step during early prototyping when evaluating different algorithms for feasibility.”

CRISP-DM Framework – Modeling Phase:“Selecting candidate models is the first step in model development after understanding the data.”

→ LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression minimizes the squared residuals (e²), just like OLS, but adds an L1 penalty to encourage sparsity in the coefficients. Thus, the residual component minimized is still the sum of squared errors.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: |e| is absolute error, not used in standard LASSO objective.

B: e is the error term, but minimization applies to its squared version.

C: Minimizing to exactly 0 is idealistic but not realistic.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Study Guide – Section 3.3:“LASSO minimizes squared errors with an additional L1 regularization term.”

Elements of Statistical Learning, Chapter 6:“LASSO regression uses the same residual sum of squares (e²) as OLS for error measurement, with an added constraint.”

—

→ Granularity misalignment refers to a mismatch between the level of detail in the predictor variables and the event being predicted.

In this case, flat tires are likely discrete, infrequent events, while tire pressure is measured weekly. If the prediction model is trying to link a specific tire pressure value to a binary outcome (flat tire: yes/no), and the timing doesn't align precisely, the predictor variable (pressure) may not be granular enough to accurately associate with the event.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: While outliers can exist, they are not the most immediate concern given the time-series nature of the data.

C: While domain expertise is helpful, it doesn't directly address the data structure issue.

D: Lagged observations can be engineered in modeling but aren’t the primary problem here.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 3.1 (Data Granularity):“Granularity misalignment occurs when the temporal or spatial resolution of features does not align with the prediction target.”

Data Science Process Guide, Section 2.3:“Predictive performance can suffer when temporal mismatch exists between observations and outcomes. Granularity issues must be resolved prior to modeling.”

—

→ Senior executives and the C-suite are primarily interested in decision-support insights rather than technical or academic depth. Thus, appropriate content includes:

C. Final recommendations: Executives need clear actions or decisions.

D. High-level results: Summarized performance, trends, or KPIs without technical jargon.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Literature reviews are too detailed and academic.

B: Code is technical and not relevant to business strategy.

E: Statistical tests may overwhelm a non-technical audience.

F: Sharing security keys violates cybersecurity protocols.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 5.5 (Communication & Visualization):“Executive presentations should include concise, actionable insights and high-level summaries to support strategic decision-making.”

Harvard Business Review – Data Storytelling:“Executives value clear insights, visual summaries, and recommendations. Avoid technical deep dives unless specifically requested.”

—

When running a model on a distributed system, encountering memory constraint errors indicates that the current nodes in the cluster do not have enough memory to handle the model. The most scalable and immediate solution is:

→ Adding Nodes to a Cluster Deployment – This increases the total available memory and compute power. In distributed computing environments like Apache Spark or Hadoop, horizontal scaling via node addition is a standard remedy for resource bottlenecks, including memory limitations.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Containerizing doesn’t inherently solve memory issues unless paired with resource upgrades.

B. Cloud migration may offer more resources, but without scaling configuration, memory limits may persist.

C. Edge deployment is for low-latency, local processing – often with less memory, not more.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 5.2 (Infrastructure & Scaling):“To resolve memory limitations in distributed systems, scaling out by adding nodes is the most direct and cost-effective method.”

Data Engineering Fundamentals (Cloud/Distributed Systems):“Cluster resource constraints (e.g., memory) can be mitigated by increasing node count, enabling parallel execution and expanded memory pools.”

—

→ The most efficient and practical approach is to consult the business stakeholders to understand which sites or data partitions relate to chemical operations. This avoids unnecessary processing of irrelevant data and aligns with the data science best practice of combining domain knowledge with technical methods.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Ingesting all data without guidance is time- and resource-intensive.

B: Analyzing all data indiscriminately can dilute the focus on chemical business specifics.

D: Using the largest data set arbitrarily may not reflect chemical operations and lacks targeted relevance.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 5.1:“Collaboration with domain experts and stakeholders ensures the data scientist focuses on relevant sources and minimizes inefficiency in data preparation.”

CRISP-DM Model – Business Understanding Phase:“Clarifying project objectives with business input is key to aligning data selection with analytical goals.”

—

Given the requirements:

Minimized file size

Fast ingestion

Schema preservation (including data types)

The most appropriate format is:

→ Parquet – It is a columnar storage file format developed for efficient data processing. Parquet files are compressed, support schema embedding, and enable fast columnar reads, making them ideal for analytical workloads and big data environments.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. JSON: Text-heavy and lacks native support for data types/schema.

C. XML: Verbose and has poor performance in storage and ingestion speed.

D. CSV: Flat structure, doesn’t store data types or schema, and can be large in size.

Official References:

CompTIA DataX (DY0-001) Official Study Guide – Section 6.2 (Data Storage Formats):“Parquet is a preferred format for data analysis as it provides efficient compression and encoding with embedded schema information, making it ideal for minimal storage and fast ingestion.”

Apache Parquet Documentation:“Parquet is designed for efficient data storage and retrieval. It includes schema support and works best for analytics use cases.”

Parquet is a columnar storage format that automatically includes schema (data types), uses efficient compression to minimize file size, and enables very fast reads for analytic workloads.